D.Ariz.: Following for 30 miles not a seizure

Following defendant for 30 miles is not a seizure. Finally, there was a consensual encounter. The R&R found it not; the USDJ disagrees. United States v. Ramos, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166913 (D. Ariz. Sep. 14, 2022).*

2½ months isn’t stale in a child pornography investigation. United States v. Long, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167014 (S.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2022).*

Defendant’s cell phone was lawfully seized with exigent circumstances, and it was later searched with a warrant. State v. Hudson, 2022-Ohio-3253, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 3057 (2d Dist. Sep. 16, 2022).*

The bench warrant for FTA here was based on a finding of probable cause and it satisfied the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Brown, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166454 (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Seizure, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.