D.Minn.: Alleged alibi wasn’t enough for Franks challenge here

Defendant wasn’t entitled to a Franks hearing by attempting to show that he had an alibi for only one controlled buy at issue, which wasn’t quite good enough anyway for probable cause. United States v. Washington, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93561 (D.Minn. May 25, 2022).*

Defendant in his motion to suppress didn’t show standing, and the little record there is suggests none. The parties are invited to brief it further. United States v. Wills, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93642 (D.Conn. May 25, 2022).*

Petitioner’s 2255 claim that the drug dog’s records had been altered fails under Franks. Nahmani v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93916 (S.D.Fla. May 25, 2022).*

Appellant’s specific issue for appeal wasn’t the one presented to the trial court, so it’s waived. Rodriguez v. State, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 3546 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburgh May 26, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.