MD: Def’s DNA from a prior dismissed case admissible here

Defendant’s DNA was obtained in a 2014 case that was dismissed. The DNA from that was used to connect him to this case. The prior DNA results are not excludable just because the case went away. Hayes v. State, 2022 Md. App. LEXIS 224 (Mar. 25, 2022).

The user of a cell phone has standing to contest a warrant for its CSLI. Pre-Carpenter acquisition of the CSLI was in good faith. United States v. Washington, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54160 (D.Utah Mar. 24, 2022).*

Involuntary hospitalization is a Fourth Amendment issue. Glass v. Mayas, 984 F.2d 55, 58 (2d Cir. 1993). Lurch v. Chaput, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54364 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2022).*

There was reasonable suspicion for a stop and consent for extension. Dog sniff valid. State v. Drake, 311 Neb. 219, 2022 Neb. LEXIS 37 (Mar. 25, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.