E.D.Pa.: Can’t relitigate denial of motion to suppress in motion for new trial

A motion for new trial is not the place to relitigate denial of a motion to suppress. United States v. Mack, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14024 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2021).

There was reasonable suspicion on the totality for defendant’s stop based on a corroborated “snitch” (as described by the officer). It was reasonable for the officer to lift defendant’s shirt and that revealed a gun. United States v. Leagard, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13621 (M.D. La. Jan. 25, 2021).*

“The district court properly dismissed Bobadilla’s Fourth Amendment claim because Bobadilla failed to allege facts sufficient to show that the patdown search conducted by defendant Guzman was unreasonable.” He also didn’t factually support damages in the complaint. Bobadilla v. Lizarraga, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 2105 (9th Cir. Jan. 26, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.