WY: Questions about travel plans are allowed to put trip in “context”

Basic questions about where defendant and his passenger were going were reasonable to put their trip into “context.” That led to reasonable suspicion. Pryce v. State, 2020 WY 151, 2020 Wyo. LEXIS 178 (Dec. 16, 2020). (And one could ask: What business of the officer is that?)

The search warrant for digital media was sufficiently particular to look for evidence of child molestation. Albrecht v. State, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS 536 (Dec. 16, 2020).*

“[T]he Fourth Amendment governs social workers’ investigations of allegations of child abuse.” McCullough v. Herron, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 39522 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Digital Searches, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.