D.Ariz.: SW for law office was apparently one office with one entrance

HSI obtained a search warrant for the “law office of Marivel Cantu-Madril” which was in Suite D at the address, and her husband’s law office was in Suite E. The entrance to both offices was through the front door to E, and then through interior doors to D. Both were leased in both names. The search warrant for D once they got inside was particular enough. United States v. Cantu-Madril, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200370 (D. Ariz. Nov. 18, 2019).

Defendant’s pretext argument wasn’t presented to the trial court, so it’s waived on appeal. State v. Adams, 2019-Ohio-4762, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4817 (9th Dist. Nov. 20, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.