A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Retest of inconclusive UA was reasonable

The military judge erred in suppressing the results of a second “reinspection” UA administered as a base protocol after a first UA after an AWOL come up positive, diluted, or inconclusive. It was a reasonable command imposed requirement. United States v. Bruno, 2017 CCA LEXIS 573 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Aug. 23, 2017) (unpublished).

EMTs’ and officers’ actions in restraining plaintiff with handcuffs on a gurney when EMTs were called to her house because she was having a violent seizure and was acting irrationally. They also looked for medication in the house on top of dressers and in open places in case it was drug related. Their actions were objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Roth v. Viviano, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16321 (6th Cir. Aug. 22, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Military searches, Reasonableness, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.