Daily Archives: June 30, 2024

CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

The fact the drug dog here had only a 59% (or 80%) success rate is still probable cause. The fact a dog can’t tell the difference between legal and illegal cannabis is of no moment. It’s still probable cause. United … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA7: Drug dog’s 59% success rate still PC

D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

Honda leased a car that was impounded and towed from the driver because it was unlicensed. Eleven months later Honda located the car and there were thousands of accumulated fees. Honda sued under § 1983. The initial seizure was valid … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Car leasing company had no 4A claim to car’s lawful impoundment, despite not knowing for 11 months

Air Force: Court martial access to government-owned records is not a 4A issue

Court martial access to government-owned records is not a Fourth Amendment issue. In re AG, 2024 CCA LEXIS 256 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. June 28, 2024). “Based on the foregoing, Craine was not entitled to a Franks hearing because he … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Air Force: Court martial access to government-owned records is not a 4A issue

Cal.1: California juries may be instructed on refusal of consent to blood draw and insisting on a SW as evidence of guilt

“The question presented here is this: If, following a valid arrest for such an offense, a motorist refuses to cooperate in the taking of a blood test unless a warrant is first obtained, may the jury at the motorist’s ensuing … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges | Comments Off on Cal.1: California juries may be instructed on refusal of consent to blood draw and insisting on a SW as evidence of guilt

N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more

When a stop is based on a computerized law enforcement database, whether it has to be corroborated (see Gonzalez v. United States Immigration. & Customs Enf’t, 975 F.3d 788, 819 (9th Cir. 2020)) isn’t decided here because here there was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: When a stop is based on a law enforcement database, does reliability have to be shown? Here there was more