Daily Archives: June 28, 2024

MT: State investigative subpoena for medical records requires showing of PC

An investigative subpoena for protected medical records must be based on probable cause. Here, there was objective facts in addition to defendant’s DUI prior that showed probable cause. State v. Hesser, 2024 MT 134, 2024 Mont. LEXIS 686 (June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on MT: State investigative subpoena for medical records requires showing of PC

CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed

A state search warrant issued by a Tulsa state judge for a place in Indian country was done in good faith at the time under McGirt and would not be suppressed. United States v. Bailey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 15210 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: State SW for place in Indian country was done in good faith and is not suppressed

Reason: Baltimore Brings Back Controversial Cellphone Hacking System

Reason: Baltimore Brings Back Controversial Cellphone Hacking System by Matthew Petti (“Cellebrite is a dream come true for police surveillance. Plug in any cellphone, even a locked one, and get a full report of every file on its hard drive. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Baltimore Brings Back Controversial Cellphone Hacking System

CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls

There is no constitutional distinction between pretrial detainees and convicts in a jail for the reasonable expectation of privacy in telephone calls on a jail line phone they knew was recorded. State v. Bember, 2024 Conn. LEXIS 153 (June 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Pretrial detainees still have no REP in jail calls