Monthly Archives: April 2023

D.S.C.: Younger doctrine precludes habeas action against pending state criminal case, here over the search

Petitioner’s 2241 habeas action against an ongoing state prosecution challenging the search is barred by Younger. Johnson v. Warden Marlboro Cty. Det. Ctr., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67605 (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2023). Defendant’s girlfriend accidentally saw child pornography on defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Younger doctrine precludes habeas action against pending state criminal case, here over the search

E.D.Wis.: “Whistleblower” is still a CI whose story must be corroborated

A business fraud “whistleblower”’s statement was too conclusory to show probable cause. Franks hearing granted. United States v. Schampers, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68205 (E.D. Wis. Apr. 19, 2023). Defendant was driving back and forth between Plattsburgh NY and Burlington … Continue reading

Posted in General warrant, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: “Whistleblower” is still a CI whose story must be corroborated

Reason: What Would An Originalist Fourth Amendment Require?

Reason: What Would An Originalist Fourth Amendment Require? by Orin S. Kerr

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reason: What Would An Originalist Fourth Amendment Require?

CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

“[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.” Osmon v. United States, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9177 (4th Cir. Apr. 18, 2023). Defendant’s Franks motion fails because there’s no offer of proof … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

E.D.N.Y.: What’s the burden under 18 U.S.C. § 1345 v. SW issuance? Preponderance or PC?

This is a patent action involving an AR-15 trigger mechanism that can convert the gun to a machine gun. The government got involved to enjoin it. The defendants seek a transfer to W.D.Tex. which is denied. The court addresses 18 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: What’s the burden under 18 U.S.C. § 1345 v. SW issuance? Preponderance or PC?

D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

Hawai’i’s Covid quarantines were not Fourth Amendment seizures to aid government intrusions. For Our Rights v. Ige, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66956 (D. Haw. Apr. 17, 2023). Exigent circumstances for warrantless police action is based on an objective standard. United … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge was conclusory and based on mere typographical errors. United States v. Howard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9069 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023). Habeas petitioner’s admission of procedural default of his Fourth Amendment claim was an admission there … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

CA4: CI’s 911 call showing stress of a startling event was reliable

A CI’s 911 call “‘under the stress of excitement caused by a startling event’ (making the call less likely to be preplanned),” was reliable enough for reasonable suspicion. Torres v. Ball, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9076 (4th Cir. Apr. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA4: CI’s 911 call showing stress of a startling event was reliable

PA: SW for flashlight app data on cell phone sustained

The affidavits for search warrant for this cell phone were overbroad as to what was sought lacking probable cause except for location data and use of the flashlight function. Defendant was accused of using the flashlight on his cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Excessive force, Overbreadth | Comments Off on PA: SW for flashlight app data on cell phone sustained

C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

“‘The mere occurrence of a firearm seizure during a traffic stop, however, is not enough to establish a Second Amendment violation. Police seize and confiscate firearms routinely, and this Court will not presume that each and every one of those … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

D.P.R.: Mere presence of FBI at USPO search didn’t make PO ‘stalking horse’

Mere presence of FBI and other law enforcement officers at USPO’s search based on reasonable suspicion did not make the PO a “stalking horse” for the police. United States v. Borges-Sánchez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66017 (D.P.R. Apr. 14, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Nexus, Probation / Parole search, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Mere presence of FBI at USPO search didn’t make PO ‘stalking horse’

CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

Officers gathered information that defendant’s son lived in his house and presented it for a search warrant. After the search they found out he didn’t. The warrant was still issued in good faith. United States v. Jordan, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

MI: Trees on undeveloped land were not “effects” for 4A

A city ordinance regulating trees was not a Fourth Amendment seizure because the trees were not on the curtilage of a home and weren’t independently subject to the Fourth Amendment. (Otherwise, a taking occurred, and that’s way outside the scope … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Open fields | Comments Off on MI: Trees on undeveloped land were not “effects” for 4A

FL2: Def’s mental health seizure was unreasonable under state law; his search incident thus was unreasonable

Defendant’s mental health seizure didn’t comply with state law and was unreasonable. There was no face-to-face meeting to evaluate his condition required by law. His girlfriend had reported that he was sending suicidal text messages. K.M. v. State, 2023 Fla. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Def’s mental health seizure was unreasonable under state law; his search incident thus was unreasonable

M.D.Fla.: Geofence SW decided on GFE alone

In this Hobbs Act robbery case, ATF got a geofence warrant to attempt to isolate who was committing a string of robberies in the Tampa Bay area. Instead of even considering the merits, the court goes directly to the good … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Geofence SW decided on GFE alone

CA6: Entry onto driveway didn’t violate curtilage

Officers’ entry onto plaintiff’s driveway did not violate curtilage. Habich v. Wayne Cty., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 8868 (6th Cir. Apr. 12, 2023). No reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of trash cans left at the curb for collection. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA6: Entry onto driveway didn’t violate curtilage

Cal.2: Geofence warrant was a bit overbroad, but GFE still applies

A geofence warrant was sought in 2019 for Google which provided several subject phones in the vicinity of a murder. The court finds the warrant was not particular enough, but applies the good faith exception because geofence warrants were so … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, geofence, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on Cal.2: Geofence warrant was a bit overbroad, but GFE still applies

E.D.Pa.: Homeowner can be handcuffed during home search without his being arrested

Having the homeowner in handcuffs during a search of his house and then releasing him when done is reasonable under Michigan v. Summers. Armstrong v. Gretsky, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63028 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2023). Defendant parolee tried to … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Homeowner can be handcuffed during home search without his being arrested

Cal.4: Misdemeanants stated claim that DNA testing of them was a violation of state right of privacy

Plaintiffs stated a claim that the Orange County program for collection of DNA from misdemeanants violated their right to privacy. There may be instances were a misdemeanor may be a “serious crime” but in general, no. The trial court erred … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, DNA, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Cal.4: Misdemeanants stated claim that DNA testing of them was a violation of state right of privacy

AR: Failure to argue against GFE below bars argument on appeal

Failure to challenge application of the good faith exception in the trial court on running the LPN through insurance database precludes challenging it on appeal. Erby v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 220, 2023 Ark. App. LEXIS 211 (April 12, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Failure to argue against GFE below bars argument on appeal