Daily Archives: March 22, 2023

OH3: Look behind refrigerator during exigent entry was inadvertent plain view

The warrantless entry into defendant’s house was justified by the exigency of a child allegedly in peril, which was not in dispute. While waiting for paperwork to be completed, one officer could see slightly behind the refrigerator and saw packaged … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH3: Look behind refrigerator during exigent entry was inadvertent plain view

D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

Three days of real time CSLI was obtained by the police because of a missing child, and it was reasonable as exigency. United States v. Torres, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44017 (D.N.M. Mar. 15, 2023).* No qualified immunity for Tasing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

D.Kan.: Not responding to govt’s 4A alternative arguments de facto waiver

The government’s alterative theories to support the search were sufficient to avoid even deciding a good faith mistake of fact by the officers. Moreover, defendant never addressed the government’s alternative arguments in his briefing. United States v. Bell-Johnson, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Not responding to govt’s 4A alternative arguments de facto waiver

E.D.Wis.: PC for a place can be shown by inference

Probable cause evidence can be found in a particular place can be shown by inference, and direct evidence not required. United States v. Hayes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45203 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 17, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44211 … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: PC for a place can be shown by inference

E.D.La.: 4A and Art. III standing are distinct questions

Just because there’s no Fourth Amendment “standing” in bank records, that doesn’t mean that there’s no Article III standing to challenge interference with privacy in bank records. Hawkins v. Sanders, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45000 (E.D. La. Mar. 16, 2023):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.La.: 4A and Art. III standing are distinct questions