Monthly Archives: December 2022

SCOTUS orders SG response to pole camera cert. petition

Moore v. United States, 22-481 from SCOTUSBlog.Issue: Whether long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home and curtilage is a Fourth Amendment search. The Solicitor General waived response Dec. 9. On Dec. 15, the government was … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on SCOTUS orders SG response to pole camera cert. petition

D.Nev.: Flight not RS, but in a high crime area it more likely is

Flight alone is not reasonable suspicion. Flight in a high crime area is more likely to be. United States v. Holmes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225855 (D. Nev. Dec. 14, 2022). “Determining the appellant’s identity was necessary to permit the … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Flight not RS, but in a high crime area it more likely is

CA4: When officer asked to pat him down, def raised his arms, and that’s consent

When the officer asked to pat him down, defendant raised his arms. That was consent. There was also reasonable suspicion. United States v. Pentecost, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 34656 (4th Cir. Dec. 15, 2022).* “[I]n-home interviews are presumptively non-custodial.” United … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Custody | Comments Off on CA4: When officer asked to pat him down, def raised his arms, and that’s consent

WaPo: Police thought his cash was suspicious. So they took it. And won’t give it back.

WaPo: Police thought his cash was suspicious. So they took it. And won’t give it back. by George F. Will:

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on WaPo: Police thought his cash was suspicious. So they took it. And won’t give it back.

NY Daily News: NYPD settles lawsuit over unconstitutional warrant checks

NY Daily News: NYPD settles lawsuit over unconstitutional warrant checks (“Conducting a warrant check on someone without sufficient cause violates a person’s fourth amendment rights, civil rights attorneys say.”) WaPo: NYPD ends tactic of prolonging stops to check for warrants … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Daily News: NYPD settles lawsuit over unconstitutional warrant checks

CA10: State SW issued for DNA in Indian country was still in good faith

A state search warrant for defendant’s DNA for an offense in Indian Country was relied upon in good faith, despite defendant’s contention the warrant was issued by an issuing authority outside the jurisdiction. McGirt doesn’t change this. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA10: State SW issued for DNA in Indian country was still in good faith

Cal.2: MJ smell associated with minors still RS for an offense

Officers ran an LPN and saw that the vehicle had expired tags. Driving next to the car, officers smelled burnt marijuana and knew that the users were minors which is still an offense under California law. That was cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on Cal.2: MJ smell associated with minors still RS for an offense

D.S.C.: “The victim’s lack of cooperation alone does not vitiate probable cause.”

Once probable cause arose, “The victim’s lack of cooperation alone does not vitiate probable cause.” Ebersole v. Lex Co Pub. Defs. Office, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 224874 (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2022). The leaseholder was a co-resident and she had the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.S.C.: “The victim’s lack of cooperation alone does not vitiate probable cause.”

AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DV civil proceeding

The exclusionary rule does not apply in Domestic Violence Protective Order proceeding. Green v. State, 2022 Alas. LEXIS 140 (Dec. 14, 2022) (due process claim). Multiple calls between the CI and defendant arranging a fentanyl deal and defendant showing up … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on AK: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DV civil proceeding

OH4: Once dog alerts, automobile exception arises, and vehicle can be moved for search

Once a drug dog alerted on defendant’s car, the automobile exception arose, and the search did not have to occur right away. The vehicle could be removed to another location for the search. State v. Harper, 2022-Ohio-4357, 2022 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH4: Once dog alerts, automobile exception arises, and vehicle can be moved for search

CA6: Common law rule that misd must be in presence of officer for warrantless arrest not part of 4A

The common law rule of a misdemeanor offense needing to be in the presence of the officer to be a basis for an arrest is not considered part of the Fourth Amendment. “And our court has held that the offense … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Common law, Custody, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Common law rule that misd must be in presence of officer for warrantless arrest not part of 4A

CA6: Def’s consent to search included a later dog sniff

Defendant consented to an original search for drugs. The vehicle was moved elsewhere and a dog sniff occurred. His consent carried over to the dog sniff. United States v. Rodgers, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 34250 (6th Cir. Dec. 12, 2022). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s consent to search included a later dog sniff

CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with a motorist violates clearly established law

A traffic stop to flirt with a motorist violates clearly established law. But this is a more complicated. “Ultimately, Plaintiff’s appeal rises and falls on the question of whether Defendant’s conduct violated clearly established law. To the degree that Defendant acted … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with a motorist violates clearly established law

W.D.Tenn.: Merely saying in SW affidavit drug dealers usually keep stuff at home isn’t nexus; but GFE applies anyway

Merely alleging in a search warrant application that drug dealers usually keep drugs at home does not satisfy the nexus requirement. It does, however, satisfy the good faith exception. Motion to suppress denied. United States v. Neal, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Merely saying in SW affidavit drug dealers usually keep stuff at home isn’t nexus; but GFE applies anyway

CA3: Scope of curtilage argument changed on appeal and thus waived

This case involved an argument about what is curtilage around a tent and firepit. Explosives were found outside this curtilage. On appeal, the scope of curtilage changed, and it’s waived. United States v. Madziarek, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 34076 (3d … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on CA3: Scope of curtilage argument changed on appeal and thus waived

CA5: Dog sniff of the person at the border does not require RS

A dog sniff of defendant’s person at the border did not require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Tenorio, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 33978 (5th Cir. Dec. 9, 2022). The credibility determinations on whether defendant was subjected to arrest or not … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA5: Dog sniff of the person at the border does not require RS

WI: A description of a Harley in Wisconsin in April is generic and not RS

The description of the offending vehicle as a Harley in Wisconsin is so generic it can’t support a stop. “After all, Wisconsin is the home of Harley-Davidson, and it is one of, if not the most popular manufacturers of motorcycles … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: A description of a Harley in Wisconsin in April is generic and not RS

S.D.Cal.: Release condition with firearm restriction and search waiver did not violate 2A or 4A

Defendant’s release condition of a firearm restriction and Fourth Amendment waiver because of a prior misdemeanor firearms conviction doesn’t violate the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen (2022). Heller supports the court’s conclusion. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Release condition with firearm restriction and search waiver did not violate 2A or 4A

CA9: Private search of CSLI made it admissible in admin proceeding

The Washington State Department of Labor and Industries received information from whistleblowers of cell site location information the defendant business collected to show alleged violations of state law. This was a private search, and Carpenter is not implicated. Kleiser v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Inventory, Private search | Comments Off on CA9: Private search of CSLI made it admissible in admin proceeding

E.D.Wis.: Being a corporate official alone doesn’t confer standing

Defendants are corporate officials of a business that was searched. That fact alone doesn’t give them standing, and the motion papers don’t really help. This is a search under a warrant, and the defendants carry the burden on standing and … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Being a corporate official alone doesn’t confer standing