Monthly Archives: November 2022

D.N.M.: DEA admin. subpoena to doctor’s office for all patient records of 41 was overbroad

A DEA administrative subpoena to a doctor’s office was overbroad where it sought all patient records for 41 patients. The doctor’s objection is sustained. The subpoena needs to be narrower in scope to match that of the investigation. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.N.M.: DEA admin. subpoena to doctor’s office for all patient records of 41 was overbroad

M.D.Fla.: Lack of a notary seal on state SW papers is a frivolous 4A issue

The Fourth Amendment argument that lack of a notary seal on Florida search warrant papers makes it void is frivolous. Amalfitano v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209729 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 18, 2022). An officer using a dead man’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Lack of a notary seal on state SW papers is a frivolous 4A issue

N.D.Ohio: Proving nexus to an alleged drug dealer’s home

Proving nexus to an alleged drug dealer’s home discussed in United States v. Stafford, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210032 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 18, 2022):

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Proving nexus to an alleged drug dealer’s home

W.D.N.Y.: RS for parole search of house justified by failure to report, curfew and travel violations, and tampering with GPS

A parolee’s “fail[ure] to report to the parole office, staying out past curfew, traveling out of his parole-approved area, and tampering with his GPS monitor” justified a parole search of the home. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: RS for parole search of house justified by failure to report, curfew and travel violations, and tampering with GPS

USA Today: Police kill far too many people during traffic stops. We must change why stops are made.

USA Today: Police kill far too many people during traffic stops. We must change why stops are made. by Finesse Moreno-Rivera (“Police have killed more than 1,000 Americans this year – more than any other point in the past decade, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on USA Today: Police kill far too many people during traffic stops. We must change why stops are made.

CA6: Seeing person named in arrest warrant at place she was staying satisfied Payton

Officers had sufficient information under Payton that a woman for whom they had a warrant was on the premises she was supposedly living at when they entered. They’d seen her there, and CIs put her there. United States v. Essex, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA6: Seeing person named in arrest warrant at place she was staying satisfied Payton

M.D.Fla.: Positive UA is RS for a search of a probationer’s home

A positive UA is reasonable suspicion for a search of a probationer’s home. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209507 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 17, 2022). “To prevail on a Fourth Amendment claim for false arrest, Johnson must establish … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Positive UA is RS for a search of a probationer’s home

E.D.Ark.: “Place of residence” for a parole search of an absconder includes a motel room he’s staying in

The “place of residence” for a parole search of an absconder includes a motel room he’s staying in. He also has no standing to challenge a search of a trash can outside the room. United States v. Nichols, 2022 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: “Place of residence” for a parole search of an absconder includes a motel room he’s staying in

CA2: Not unreasonable here to use flashbang device in execution of SW

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the use of a flashbang device in execution of the search warrant at defendant’s home. The Fourth Amendment does not usually require limits on how the warrant should be executed. Here, it … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: Not unreasonable here to use flashbang device in execution of SW

CA5: 1836 US-Morocco Treaty of Peace and Friendship as applied to courthouse metal detector not “clearly established law”

Plaintiffs are Moorish-Americans who, on the way to file papers with the clerk, refused to go through the metal detector at the Caddo Parish Courthouse. Entrance was denied. They refused to leave and were then arrested for trespass. They sued … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: 1836 US-Morocco Treaty of Peace and Friendship as applied to courthouse metal detector not “clearly established law”

MS: Using ladder to look over wall in rented storage unit wasn’t a “search” and did not violate any REP

Officers used a ladder to look over a ceilingless wall in a storage building into defendant’s leased unit. The observation led to a search warrant. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy from that look because anyone there could do … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on MS: Using ladder to look over wall in rented storage unit wasn’t a “search” and did not violate any REP

OR: Holding def’s ID for 30 minutes for no apparent reason was a seizure without RS

Retaining defendant’s ID for 30 minutes before even thinking about questioning his identity was a seizure without reasonable suspicion. State v. Orman, 322 Or. App. 707, 2022 Ore. App. LEXIS 1479 (Nov. 16, 2022). Defendant was not seized when he … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Holding def’s ID for 30 minutes for no apparent reason was a seizure without RS

S.D.W.Va.: Dispatch’s mistake of fact def’s vehicle was unregistered did not make stop unreasonable

Defendant challenged one basis for his stop, an inspection sticker. However, dispatch also said the vehicle was unregistered and that’s a valid reason. It turned out, however, it was validly registered. “It does not matter that Defendant’s vehicle was in … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Dispatch’s mistake of fact def’s vehicle was unregistered did not make stop unreasonable

N.D.Ind.: Franks hearing ordered over officer’s claim of smell of MJ

Defendant gets a Franks hearing even if to rebut the government’s claim the good faith exception applies. The affiant officer claimed there was an “overwhelming” smell of marijuana coming from defendant’s house as they approached for a knock-and-talk, which was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Franks hearing ordered over officer’s claim of smell of MJ

E.D.Va.: Could have seen for plain view isn’t the same as actually seeing

Defendant did not abandon the vehicle he was driving with permission of the owner. When officers asked for consent he said it wasn’t his and it was his “baby mama’s” vehicle. Her permission gave him standing. The court disagrees with … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Could have seen for plain view isn’t the same as actually seeing

D.S.C.: Court is “troubled” by methods of search, but exclusion isn’t remedy

Defendant’s claim there wasn’t any search warrant and that he wasn’t shown one is rejected. He came out of the house with his hands up and empty, and an officer is shown on bodycam handing him a paper and him … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Court is “troubled” by methods of search, but exclusion isn’t remedy

FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

Defendant’s blurting out that he’d murdered someone caught on bodycam in the ER wasn’t subject to suppression under the state communications privacy law because there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the utterance. Reed v. State, 2022 Fla. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

D.Minn.: Govt fails on its burden of proving GFE applies; no witnesses called

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone lacked probable cause for lack of specificity. More importantly, the government failed in its burden of proof to show the good faith exception applies. United States v. Armstrong, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207602 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt fails on its burden of proving GFE applies; no witnesses called

IL: Smell of burnt mj alone not RS

The smell of burnt cannabis without seeing more is not reasonable suspicion in Illinois. People v. Redmond, 2022 IL App (3d) 210524, 2022 Ill. App. LEXIS 479 (Nov. 15, 2022). On an Anders brief, the inventory search of defendant’s car … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Smell of burnt mj alone not RS

E.D.Ark.: Inmate states claim against Sheriff and jail phone provider that privileged attorney calls were turned over to police

Plaintiff Texas inmate was in an Arkansas county jail in 2015-17, and he discovered in 2021 through his current defense lawyer that the county jail phone contractor turned over telephone calls between him and his criminal defense lawyer to the … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Inmate states claim against Sheriff and jail phone provider that privileged attorney calls were turned over to police