Monthly Archives: December 2020

OH2: Post-conviction 4A claim of lack of PC for SW fails for failure to include affidavit in record

Defendant’s post-conviction claim that defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the validity of the search warrant in his case fails. He has to show he would have prevailed on the search issue, but the affidavit for the warrant isn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Post-conviction 4A claim of lack of PC for SW fails for failure to include affidavit in record

CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

The military trial judge erred in concluding that the search authorization required AFOSI complete information to determine probable cause for defendant’s DNA in a sex assault case. It’s not. Just because there were differing versions of how dressed the victim … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CAAF: Not all details of alleged offense need to be included in request for search authorization

D.Neb.: Knights eliminated stalking horse theory of police using POs to conduct searches

Knights eliminated the stalking horse theory of police using POs to conduct searches because they can, too. United States v. Brun, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 239791 (D. Neb. Dec. 21, 2020). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop from a … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Knights eliminated stalking horse theory of police using POs to conduct searches

CA11: Record supports third-party consent argued but not decided below

Defendant operated through a corporate website running a gold bullion scam where money was received and no gold delivered. Another corporate employee with administrative privileges received complaints and looked in the non-public parts of the website to print evidence for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CA11: Record supports third-party consent argued but not decided below

TX3: No “sua sponte duty” in trial court to suppress evidence that the defense didn’t move to suppress

The trial court has no “sua sponte duty” to suppress evidence that the defense didn’t move to suppress. Chila v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 10219 (Tex. App. – Austin Dec. 23, 2020). Police along with USMs entered defendant’s place … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX3: No “sua sponte duty” in trial court to suppress evidence that the defense didn’t move to suppress

OH7: Police going to def’s back window and video recording him in house violated curtilage

A police officer coming to the back of defendant’s house to look in the window and video him with a cell phone violated curtilage and his reasonable expectation of privacy. State v. Desarro, 2020-Ohio-6815, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4661 (7th … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH7: Police going to def’s back window and video recording him in house violated curtilage

N.D.Ga.: Two decades of drug activity in SW for cell phone wasn’t stale because of recent information

A two decade long drug investigation into defendant didn’t rely solely on stale information to obtain a search warrant for her cell phone. “The affidavit established that she was involved in a prolonged criminal activity, that she used electronic media … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Two decades of drug activity in SW for cell phone wasn’t stale because of recent information

CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

Congress has to determine the scope of Bivens, and the court declines to extend it to a false arrest case involving a “rogue officer” alleged to have fabricated evidence in sex crime prosecutions. “This appeal is another chapter in the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8 refuses to extend Bivens to case on false arrest on false evidence

OH7: Drug testing of drug def after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable

A court ordered drug test after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable because it factors into sentence. State v. Fisher, 2020-Ohio-6829, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4672 (7th Dist. Nov. 7, 2020). Defendant, convicted of child pornography, had a release condition … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH7: Drug testing of drug def after conviction but before sentencing was reasonable

D.Md.: Taking driver’s cell phone with DL during traffic stop unreasonably extended stop and violated 4A

Taking defendant’s cell phone with DL during a traffic stop unreasonably extended the stop and was in excess of the purpose of a traffic stop. United States v. Morganstern, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 240746 (D. Me. Dec. 22, 2020). A … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Community caretaking function, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Md.: Taking driver’s cell phone with DL during traffic stop unreasonably extended stop and violated 4A

ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

Just because evidence was seized with a search warrant doesn’t make it admissible. The rules of evidence or other statute or rule still have to be complied with. City of Fargo v. Hofer, 2020 ND 252, 2020 N.D. LEXIS 264 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ND: Evidence seized by SW still needs to comply with rules of evidence to be admissible

E.D.Tenn.: SW for premises didn’t justify stop of car allowed to leave

A search warrant for the premises here did not justify defendants’ stop in their car after they were allowed to leave it. Moreover, there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop; no traffic violation, no nothing. United States v. Williamson, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: SW for premises didn’t justify stop of car allowed to leave

The Intercept: Powerful Mobile Phone Surveillance Tool Operates in Obscurity Across the Country

The Intercept: Powerful Mobile Phone Surveillance Tool Operates in Obscurity Across the Country by Sam Richards (“CellHawk helps law enforcement visualize large quantities of information collected by cellular towers and providers.”)

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy | Comments Off on The Intercept: Powerful Mobile Phone Surveillance Tool Operates in Obscurity Across the Country

The Crime Report: Is Your Phone Safe? The Dangers of Police Access to Private Digital Data

The Crime Report: Is Your Phone Safe? The Dangers of Police Access to Private Digital Data by Christa Miller (“A recent report from the Washington, D.C. nonprofit Upturn highlights the privacy and civil rights concerns arising from the use of … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Digital privacy | Comments Off on The Crime Report: Is Your Phone Safe? The Dangers of Police Access to Private Digital Data

E.D.Ky.: Standing established by def’s own recorded jail call

A jail call showed defendant’s standing that he lived in the house where the search occurred. The entry to arrest him on an arrest warrant led to a valid plain view. United States v. Essex, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238989 … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Standing established by def’s own recorded jail call

OH: Touching fog line not traffic violation

Resolving a state conflict, touching the right fog line is not a violation of Ohio’s traffic laws. State v. Turner, 2020-Ohio-6773, 2020 Ohio LEXIS 2814 (Dec. 22, 2020). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not arguing at a hearing an issue … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Touching fog line not traffic violation

PA state const. requires actual exigency for automobile exception

Resolving tension in its cases, Pennsylvania holds that its state automobile exception requires both probable cause and an actual exigency. Commonwealth v. Alexander, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 6439 (Dec. 22, 2020):

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA state const. requires actual exigency for automobile exception

Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’

Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’ by Rachel Lean (“An armed police raid of a fired COVID-19 data scientist’s home sparked a lawsuit Monday in Leon Circuit Court, which claims the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law.com: Fired COVID-19 Data Scientist Sues Over Police Raid: ‘I’m Worried … Where We’re Going’

CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

The officer prepared an affidavit and search warrant for a vehicle search and took the paperwork to a state judge. They forgot to get the warrant signed. The search was still valid because there was probable cause to search the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA8: Forgetting to get SW signed for a vehicle didn’t matter where there was PC

CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address

The good faith exception applies to the officer’s accidentally using an outdated Google maps image in a search warrant application but with a correct actual address. “The circumstances make clear that [Officer] Herron’s mistake was an honest one-a far cry … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to SW with outdated Google Map image but with correct address