Daily Archives: November 30, 2020

E.D.N.Y.: Valid strategic reasons for not using SW affidavit at trial

Defendant claimed perjury at trial because search warrant affidavits had information contrary to the trial testimony. There were good strategic reasons for not putting the affidavit in evidence. “Presumably, in deciding this claim, it is only appropriate to consider evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Valid strategic reasons for not using SW affidavit at trial

NY: Reversal for 4A violation isn’t “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claim

Reversal because of a Fourth Amendment violation isn’t a “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claims. Butler v. City of New York, 2020 NY Slip Op 33363(U), 2020 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 10130 (N.Y. Co. Oct. 14, 2020) (Martinez v. City of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NY: Reversal for 4A violation isn’t “favorable termination” for malicious prosecution claim

NY2: Affidavit for SW for cell phone completely failed to show PC

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s cell phone completely failed to show probable cause to search it and seize photographs. People v. Boothe, 2020 NY Slip Op 07084. 2020 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7311 (2d Dept. Nov. 25, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY2: Affidavit for SW for cell phone completely failed to show PC

OH1: No govt’l immunity for property taken in search not listed

When property is taken under a search warrant and listed on the return, the government has immunity for taking it. It does not, however, have immunity for property taken that is unlisted. Brown v. City of Cincinnati, 2020-Ohio-5418, 2020 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH1: No govt’l immunity for property taken in search not listed

OH1: Specific BOLO of being involved in shooting justified stop

A specific BOLO for a vehicle alleged to be involved in a shooting led to defendant’s stop with reasonable suspicion. Probable cause then developed. State v. Houston, 2020-Ohio-5421, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 4301 (1st Dist. Nov. 25, 2020). “In his … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: Specific BOLO of being involved in shooting justified stop