Daily Archives: November 15, 2020

CAAF: GFE doesn’t apply to SW wholly without PC

The service member was charged with child pornography offenses. “Appellant moved for an order in limine suppressing all evidence that the Government had found in Appellant’s home pursuant to a command authorization for search and seizure (CASS). The military judge … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Military searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CAAF: GFE doesn’t apply to SW wholly without PC

S.D.N.Y.: “Unconscionable breakdown” in SW litigation process can state habeas claim, but petitioner doesn’t plead or show one

“Petitioner does not argue that he was not provided a correct procedure to redress his Fourth Amendment claim. And indeed, there is no basis for such an argument, as the Second Circuit has indicated that New York’s procedure for litigating … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: “Unconscionable breakdown” in SW litigation process can state habeas claim, but petitioner doesn’t plead or show one

OH6: File stamp time error on SW wasn’t subject to exclusionary rule

The file stamp on a search warrant was before the judge signed it. This, however, is just a clerical error, and that doesn’t void an otherwise valid warrant. The exclusionary rule shouldn’t apply to such errors. “The testimonial evidence was … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH6: File stamp time error on SW wasn’t subject to exclusionary rule

E.D.Tenn.: Issue preclusion applies in criminal cases but state’s dismissal of criminal case after motion to suppress doesn’t preclude feds

Issue preclusion applies in criminal cases, too, and the state’s dismissal of a case in the face of a successful motion to suppress doesn’t preclude the federal government from prosecuting afterward. This is a recognition of dual sovereignty. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Issue preclusion applies in criminal cases but state’s dismissal of criminal case after motion to suppress doesn’t preclude feds