Daily Archives: November 6, 2020

Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi

Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi by Edward Ongweso Jr (“The police department in Jackson, Mississippi is partnering with two companies to stream surveillance footage from Ring cameras in a 45-day pilot program.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Vice: Police Are Tapping Into Ring Cameras to Expand Surveillance Network In Mississippi

CA6: State officer assisting a federal search is the subject of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

A state officer assisting federal officers in a search can be the subject of assault while executing a warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 1114. United States v. Scurry, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 35068 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2020). Defendant officers … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: State officer assisting a federal search is the subject of assault under 18 U.S.C. § 1114

CA4: Baltimore’s aerial surveillance program doesn’t violate 4A

Baltimore PD’s Aerial Investigative Research program (AIR) does not violate the reasonable expectation of privacy of Baltimore residents, and denial of the preliminary injunction is affirmed on appeal. Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Dep’t, 2020 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Open fields, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA4: Baltimore’s aerial surveillance program doesn’t violate 4A

New Yorker: How a C.I.A. Coverup Targeted a Whistle-blower [on “intelligence laundering”]

New Yorker: How a C.I.A. Coverup Targeted a Whistle-blower by Ronan Farrow (“When a Justice Department lawyer exposed the agency’s secret role in drug cases, leadership in the intelligence community retaliated.”):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on New Yorker: How a C.I.A. Coverup Targeted a Whistle-blower [on “intelligence laundering”]

CA2: NY Family Court orders can suffice as SWs

“New York Family Court orders provide an independent basis for police officers to enter peoples’ homes. We have repeatedly recognized that, ‘[i]n child-abuse investigations, a Family Court order is equivalent to a search warrant for Fourth Amendment purposes.’ Southerland v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: NY Family Court orders can suffice as SWs

W.D.Wash.: Single citation of 4A in state court didn’t exhaust state claim

For those attempting to understand habeas, and I’m not sure I’m one: A single citation to the Fourth Amendment in a state brief didn’t qualify as exhaustion of the claim for § 2254(d). Berniard v. Obenland, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Single citation of 4A in state court didn’t exhaust state claim

S.D.N.Y.: Householder had common authority over def’s room to at least enter

A pair of shoes in plain view in defendant’s room in somebody else’s house were validly seized. The householder had sufficient common authority to at least consent to enter the room. It was not defendant’s primary residence. The officer’s reliance … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Householder had common authority over def’s room to at least enter