Daily Archives: July 1, 2020

CA5: Bitcoin transactions are like third-party bank records with no REP

Bitcoin transactions are akin to third-party bank records and are not governed by Carpenter. There is no added reasonable expectation of privacy in them. United States v. Gratkowski, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 20501 (5th Cir. June 30, 2020). The vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA5: Bitcoin transactions are like third-party bank records with no REP

WA: Private party returning property to def’s house per request was private searcher

The observations of a private person returning something to defendant’s dwelling for him were a private search. The police had nothing to do with it. State v. Lake, 2020 Wash. App. LEXIS 1925 (June 30, 2020).* Reasonable jurists would not … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Drug or alcohol testing, Private search | Comments Off on WA: Private party returning property to def’s house per request was private searcher

CA6: When target of an IRS summons is named, it’s not a “John Doe summons”

“There is no shortage of reasons to reject Byers’s argument. But her argument, we acknowledge, has intuitive appeal—‘Shouldn’t the government have to give a reason why it wants my information?’—and merits this fulsome response. In all, Byers has raised a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA6: When target of an IRS summons is named, it’s not a “John Doe summons”

CA7: On the totality, RS was thin, up until def fled

“If these were all the facts, establishing reasonable suspicion might have been a close call for the officers. But Wilson’s unprovoked, headlong flight from police in a high-crime area put any lingering doubt to rest. Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: On the totality, RS was thin, up until def fled

OH9: State argued RS but didn’t come forward with proof of it

The state argued there were factors supporting reasonable suspicion, but they didn’t come forward with it. Order granting motion to suppress affirmed. State v. Thomas, 2020-Ohio-3539, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2453 (9th Dist. June 30, 2020). The search warrant was … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH9: State argued RS but didn’t come forward with proof of it