Daily Archives: May 28, 2020

D.Nev.: Six days to draft a cell phone SW was reasonable

The government was diligent in getting a warrant over six days, including a weekend, where the agents and the USAO spent most of three days drafting it. “Still, the Fourth Amendment obligated the United States to ‘diligently obtain[ ] a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Six days to draft a cell phone SW was reasonable

CA9: Bringing police with criminal investigative motive to execute admin. warrant was unreasonable

An administrative inspection warrant is based on a programmatic probable cause standard, and not probable cause to believe that a crime occurred. Using the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office to help do a City of Lancaster administrative entry and search … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA9: Bringing police with criminal investigative motive to execute admin. warrant was unreasonable

CA8: Police shooting of man with gun who hadn’t pointed it without warning was unreasonable

The use of deadly force here wasn’t reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. The shooting victim had a gun in hand but he hadn’t threatened the officer with it. The failure to give a warning warn “exacerbate[s] the circumstances” and supports … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Police shooting of man with gun who hadn’t pointed it without warning was unreasonable

TN: With no findings of fact, court can look at dashcam video and draw own conclusion suppression was appropriate

The trial court didn’t make findings of fact, so the appellate court can review the dashcam video and draw its own conclusions. “The trial court reviewed the testimony of the only witness and made an implicit finding that his testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Standards of review | Comments Off on TN: With no findings of fact, court can look at dashcam video and draw own conclusion suppression was appropriate

OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal

The dashcam video was inconclusive on whether defendant stopped, but the trial court credited the officer, and that’s binding on the court of appeals. State v. Blasingame, 2020-Ohio-3087, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2029 (5th Dist. May 21, 2020).* Two dashcam … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court’s finding of officer’s credibility where dashcam didn’t help was binding on appeal