Daily Archives: May 23, 2020

OH6: State didn’t show unequivocal consent on dashcam video

Defendant’s maybe nodding her head yes was contrary to her words on the dashcam video. There was no unequivocal voluntary consent. State v. Casi, 2020-Ohio-3063, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2010 (6th Dist. May 22, 2020). “Although the video of Vaclavik’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH6: State didn’t show unequivocal consent on dashcam video

AZ: Cell phones are “property” subject to probation searches

“Cell phones provide access to an immense array of private information, much of which is stored in the Cloud or on sites controlled by third parties. As such, the United States Supreme Court concluded in Riley v. California that people … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AZ: Cell phones are “property” subject to probation searches