Daily Archives: May 20, 2020

CA2: PC and innocence of the crime charged are different things; a search incident to arrest can still be valid

Officers had probable cause to arrest for possession of marijuana despite the fact it later turned out he was innocent of possession. The inventory of his backpack was still valid. United States v. Bignon, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15972 (2d … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA2: PC and innocence of the crime charged are different things; a search incident to arrest can still be valid

AR: State const’l requirement of right to refuse consent on knock-and-talk reaffirmed; suppression hearing stipulation can’t be used at trial

The police violated a longstanding state constitutional prohibition of a knock-and-talk seeking consent to enter a home without a warning of a right to refuse. In addition, a factual stipulation for the suppression hearing couldn’t be used by the state … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AR: State const’l requirement of right to refuse consent on knock-and-talk reaffirmed; suppression hearing stipulation can’t be used at trial

CA10: Admission of CSLI evidence requires a witness for confrontation purposes

CSLI information obtained by warrant still requires a witness to explain them for confrontation purposes. State v. Lawson, 2020-Ohio-3004, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1952 (10th Dist. May 19, 2020). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress CSLI three … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Admission of CSLI evidence requires a witness for confrontation purposes

D.P.R.: USMS observing def’s arrest in Dominican Republic didn’t make arresting officers U.S. agents

The USMS observing defendant’s arrest in the Dominican Republic wasn’t enough to make the actions of the arresting officers agents of the United States. United States v. Acevedo-Martinez, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87958 (D. P.R. May 18, 2020):

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on D.P.R.: USMS observing def’s arrest in Dominican Republic didn’t make arresting officers U.S. agents

CA9: Not clearly established that County of Riverside violation warrants suppression

It was not clearly established that a County of Riverside violation of allegedly delaying a probable cause determination to gather more evidence was subject to suppression. Even Riverside doesn’t say that it is. Thus, the district court’s determination counsel wasn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Not clearly established that County of Riverside violation warrants suppression