Daily Archives: May 2, 2020

CA8: Tasing ptf eight times even while handcuffed was reasonable where he was always violently resisting

Tasing plaintiff repeatedly was not excessive force where he continued to violently resist even when handcuffed. Franklin v. Franklin Cty., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13193 (8th Cir. Apr. 24, 2020). The officer shot plaintiff after he fled after a patdown … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Tasing ptf eight times even while handcuffed was reasonable where he was always violently resisting

CA3: Police in pursuit of a shooting suspect crossed into def’s backyard; plain view of drugs sustained

Police were in pursuit of a shooting suspect and went into defendant’s back yard. Drugs in plain view could be seized. Levys v. Shamlin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13267 (3d Cir. Apr. 24, 2020). An open container stop permits a … Continue reading

Posted in Hot pursuit, Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on CA3: Police in pursuit of a shooting suspect crossed into def’s backyard; plain view of drugs sustained

HI: No prior showing of PC is required for a penal summons

No prior showing of probable cause is required for a penal summons because there is no arrest or custody under Gerstein v. Pugh. State v. Thompson, 2020 Haw. App. LEXIS 151 (Apr. 24, 2020). The district court properly denied qualified … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on HI: No prior showing of PC is required for a penal summons

OH12: Bloody clothes on ER floor were subject to plain view

Seizure of defendant’s bloody clothing from the floor of the emergency room was valid as a plain view despite his possessory interest. He was perceived at the time as the victim, but it later developed he wasn’t. State v. Jackson, … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH12: Bloody clothes on ER floor were subject to plain view

OH2: Excessive force in stop-and-frisk was unreasonable

Use of excessive bodily force for a stop-and-frisk by lifting defendant into a wall was unreasonable where defendant did nothing to justify it. That required suppressing the stop. State v. Johnson, 2020-Ohio-2742, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1707 (2d Dist. May … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Excessive force in stop-and-frisk was unreasonable

NC: Flipping off officer not disorderly conduct; stop suppressed

Flipping off the officer wasn’t disorderly conduct justifying the stop. The community caretaking function also does not apply. State v. Ellis, 2020 N.C. LEXIS 363 (May 1, 2020). The state could not show that defendant’s statements were inevitably discovered from … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NC: Flipping off officer not disorderly conduct; stop suppressed

CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds. Benson v. Chappell, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 14035 (9th Cir. May 1, 2020). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop, but the officer’s opening the car … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Search | Comments Off on CA9: County of Riverside v. McLaughlin’s 48 hour rule does not apply to parole holds

CA6: It is settled that tenants have a REP in an interior hallway open only to them

The district court erred in granting qualified immunity to the officers who entered a hallway that was associated with only one apartment that decedent clearly had a reasonable expectation of privacy in. The law is settled in this circuit. Decedent … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: It is settled that tenants have a REP in an interior hallway open only to them

D.Ariz.: Overseizure of emails by SW didn’t require suppression of all; GFE also applies

This search warrant was issued in a SSA fraud case alleging a decade of false claims. The search warrant was sufficiently particular and not overbroad. The fact the period of the alleged offense was through January 2014 did not prohibit … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Overseizure | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Overseizure of emails by SW didn’t require suppression of all; GFE also applies

M.D.Pa.: Strip search at DTF office was reasonable on PC def hid drugs in underwear and anal cavity

Officers had probable cause defendant had drugs hidden in his underwear or anal cavity. When he was taken to the DTF office, a strip search there was reasonable when there were no drugs otherwise in his possession. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Strip search at DTF office was reasonable on PC def hid drugs in underwear and anal cavity

AZ: Successfully controverting PC for SW requires return of copies of digital evidence

Defendant in a criminal case was suspected of Arizona wildlife offenses, and the state procured a search warrant. He successful controverted the warrant for lack of probable cause under state statute. Digital copies of evidence were kept by the state. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Exclusionary rule, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on AZ: Successfully controverting PC for SW requires return of copies of digital evidence