Daily Archives: March 13, 2020

D.P.R.: Search of room six hours before SW issued (not to mention lies about it) leads to suppression

The search of defendant’s room was six hours before the search warrant was issued. It was an investigative search and not a protective sweep. The officer admitted that he was looking for something to put in the affidavit for the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Search of room six hours before SW issued (not to mention lies about it) leads to suppression

TN: Hair follicle test of parents in juvenile court on less than PC was justified by special needs doctrine

The juvenile court here had justification to order a hair follicle test on defendant for drug use because of the high interest in protecting the children. The search was justified under special needs. That ultimately led to his prosecution. State … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Special needs | Comments Off on TN: Hair follicle test of parents in juvenile court on less than PC was justified by special needs doctrine

MA: Purported inventory of cell phone was investigative and unreasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and he had a cell phone in his pocket that he was using, his younger brother’s. The seizure of the phone was proper, but the purported inventory of the phone was not because … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Purported inventory of cell phone was investigative and unreasonable

OR: PC backpack contained evidence of theft; search incident permitted despite it being dropped over fence when police approached

Defendant was carrying a backpack that police had good reason to believe contained evidence of a theft. When the police came up, the backpack was tossed over a fence but was nearby. Dropping the backpack over the fence did not … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: PC backpack contained evidence of theft; search incident permitted despite it being dropped over fence when police approached

D.N.M.: Motions to quash denied in hearing on Microsoft’s relationship to NCMEC under Ackerman

Defendant gets a hearing on Microsoft’s relationship to NCMEC under Ackerman. The issue in this opinion deals with motions to quash testimony from two of three Microsoft employees. United States v. Rosenschein, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38319 (D.N.M. Mar. 5, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Motions to quash denied in hearing on Microsoft’s relationship to NCMEC under Ackerman

N.D.Ohio: The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was a continuing exigency

The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was exigency. “As is evident from the video, the exigency did not terminate due to the passage of time or as a result of [Off.] Sosenko’s attempts to manage the … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was a continuing exigency

M.D.Pa.: The triggering event in an anticipatory SW is subject to broad construction

The triggering event of an anticipatory warrant having occurred, the search warrant could be executed. The triggering event can be broadly construed. United States v. Santana, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38086 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2020). Plaintiff refused to get … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Excessive force | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: The triggering event in an anticipatory SW is subject to broad construction

CO: Officer responding to a just-occurring assault call can stop car pulling out of driveway

An officer responding to a house where an assault was just reported to have occurred could stop a car backing out of the driveway because the occupant might have been involved in it. People v. Jiron, 2020 COA 36, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: Officer responding to a just-occurring assault call can stop car pulling out of driveway

E.D.Tex.: Address of a building is usually sufficient for particularity

The address of a building is generally sufficient particularity for a search warrant. Even so, the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Wilson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37210 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 17, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Address of a building is usually sufficient for particularity