Daily Archives: December 26, 2019

Fortune: Why Apple and Google Have ‘No Real Way’ to Stop Surveillance Apps Like ToTok

Fortune: Why Apple and Google Have ‘No Real Way’ to Stop Surveillance Apps Like ToTok by Alyssa Newcomb (“Perhaps the most troubling part of it all is that there would have been no way for either company to detect any … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Fortune: Why Apple and Google Have ‘No Real Way’ to Stop Surveillance Apps Like ToTok

EFF: Ring Throws Customers Under the Bus After Data Breach

EFF: Ring Throws Customers Under the Bus After Data Breach by Cooper Quintin and Bill Budington:

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on EFF: Ring Throws Customers Under the Bus After Data Breach

CA1: Govt showed nexus to house that drug dealers keep money, books, customer lists, and product there

The district court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress because there was probable cause to issue the search warrant. It was likely that a drug dealer kept his money, books, and customer lists in a safe place like his residence, … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Govt showed nexus to house that drug dealers keep money, books, customer lists, and product there

W.D.Ky.: Bodycam video showed pretext, but there still was a factual and legal basis for stop

Officers on bodycam are talking about pretext, but there was, in fact, a factual and legal basis for the stop that makes pretext irrelevant. United States v. Jones, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219072 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 20, 2019):

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Bodycam video showed pretext, but there still was a factual and legal basis for stop

NYTimes: Giving the Gift of Surveillance

NYTimes: Giving the Gift of Surveillance by Alex Kingsbury (“As 2019 comes to a close, millions of new spying devices are headed for American homes.”)

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Giving the Gift of Surveillance

ID: Visitors during a parole search were subject to reasonable questioning

Visitors on the premises during a parole search are subject to at least some questions under Summers without it being an unreasonable detention. State v. Phipps, 2019 Ida. LEXIS 239 (Dec. 20, 2019):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on ID: Visitors during a parole search were subject to reasonable questioning

DE: Slim inference for nexus wasn’t enough, and exclusionary rule applies

The affidavit for the search warrant creates only a slim inference at best, and no facts at all, showing a nexus to the place to be searched and the fraud crime under investigation. Therefore, the search warrant lacks probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on DE: Slim inference for nexus wasn’t enough, and exclusionary rule applies

LA1: Parolee’s positive drug screen justified home search

Defendant’s positive drug screens were reason for an unannounced home and cell phone text message parole search. State v. St. Cyre, 2019 La. App. LEXIS 2305 (La. App. 1 Cir. Dec. 19, 2019). An officer found two people asleep in … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA1: Parolee’s positive drug screen justified home search

S.D.Ga.: The fact it was ambiguous whether def’s images were CP or not doesn’t nullify PC for the search

It was ambiguous whether the images that officers believed were on defendant’s computer qualified as child pornography, but the question for probable cause is reason to believe and not sufficient evidence to convict. Even so, the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: The fact it was ambiguous whether def’s images were CP or not doesn’t nullify PC for the search

CA6: Def doesn’t show officer delayed stop for drug dog; whole encounter was 5-10 minutes

Defendant argued that the officer delayed the process of issuing a traffic citation by extraneous questioning just to get a dog sniff in within the period before the traffic citation could be completed. Still, the entire process reasonably took ten … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA6: Def doesn’t show officer delayed stop for drug dog; whole encounter was 5-10 minutes

S.D.N.Y.: Typo in SW for emails could be overlooked in “common sense,” nontechnical reading

There was a typo in the affidavit for search warrant for emails, and the government procured another. The typo wasn’t even material because a “common sense” reading of the whole affidavit shows it was typographical error that could be overcome. … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Typo in SW for emails could be overlooked in “common sense,” nontechnical reading

FL2: Herring permits one police mistake for good faith, but not two

The officer gave a wrong name to police communications, and then communications gave a wrong answer back. Two mistakes was too much for Herring, and the exclusionary rule is applied. One mistake may be attenuation; two is not. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on FL2: Herring permits one police mistake for good faith, but not two

DE: Just because criminals communicate by cell phone isn’t enough to show nexus

Defendant’s cell phone search was not based on a logical nexus between defendant’s cell phone and the murder. Just because criminals communicate by cell phone isn’t enough here. State v. Johnson, 2019 Del. Super. LEXIS 661 (Dec. 18, 2019):

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on DE: Just because criminals communicate by cell phone isn’t enough to show nexus