Daily Archives: November 18, 2019

CA6: Informant’s reliability is the question, and that leads to finding of reliability of his or her hearsay

The CI’s first hand information isn’t constitutionally required for informant hearsay to be deemed credible. The question is the reliability of the informant, not so much the information which usually can’t all be pinned down anyway. United States v. Crawford, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA6: Informant’s reliability is the question, and that leads to finding of reliability of his or her hearsay

techdirt: Supreme Court’s Warrant Requirement For Cell Site Location Info Apparently Killed Another Domestic Surveillance Program

techdirt: Supreme Court’s Warrant Requirement For Cell Site Location Info Apparently Killed Another Domestic Surveillance Program by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Cell site location information, National security | Comments Off on techdirt: Supreme Court’s Warrant Requirement For Cell Site Location Info Apparently Killed Another Domestic Surveillance Program

Security Boulevard: Pew Survey: America Worries About Privacy (But Won’t Do Anything About It)

Security Boulevard: Pew Survey: America Worries About Privacy (But Won’t Do Anything About It) by Richi Jennings:

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Security Boulevard: Pew Survey: America Worries About Privacy (But Won’t Do Anything About It)

IL: Flagrantly unconstitutional arrest here means no attenuation for statement

Defendant’s arrest was flagrantly unconstitutional, and his statement wasn’t attenuated from it. People v. Gutierrez, 2019 IL App (3d) 180405, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 890 (Nov. 15, 2019).* Defendant was convicted of possession of a weapon that was in his … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Protective sweep | Comments Off on IL: Flagrantly unconstitutional arrest here means no attenuation for statement