Daily Archives: April 22, 2019

PBS: Police are now taking roadside blood samples to catch impaired drivers

PBS: Police are now taking roadside blood samples to catch impaired drivers by Jenni Bergal:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on PBS: Police are now taking roadside blood samples to catch impaired drivers

Law.com: ‘Carpenter’ Squared: Review and Reconcile State Court Cases Impacted by Landmark SCOTUS Decision

Law.com: ‘Carpenter’ Squared: Review and Reconcile State Court Cases Impacted by Landmark SCOTUS Decision by Peter A. Crusco In his Cyber Crime column, Peter A. Crusco writes: Now that the initial dust raised by ‘Carpenter’ has settled, it is illuminating … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Law.com: ‘Carpenter’ Squared: Review and Reconcile State Court Cases Impacted by Landmark SCOTUS Decision

WY: New facts after the stop not required if there was RS all along

New facts after the stop are not required to extend the stop, as long as there is reasonable suspicion with the stop. Brown v. State, 2019 WY 42, 2019 Wyo. LEXIS 44 (Apr. 19, 2019). Pre-Carpenter obtaining of CSLI was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: New facts after the stop not required if there was RS all along

AR: Claim of misstatement or incorrect fact in SW affidavit doesn’t state Franks claim without allegation it was reckless or intentional

Merely stating that information in the affidavit for search warrant was incorrect doesn’t preserve a Franks challenge without also alleging that it was recklessly or intentionally made. King v. State, 2019 Ark. 114, 2019 Ark. LEXIS 125 (Apr. 18, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on AR: Claim of misstatement or incorrect fact in SW affidavit doesn’t state Franks claim without allegation it was reckless or intentional

E.D.Ky.: RS of drugs doesn’t automatically mean “armed and dangerous”

Reasonable suspicion defendant was involved with drugs does not equate with “armed and dangerous.” Without minimizing the danger weapons would create, it’s a dangerous precedent to go that far just based on officers’ experience. United States v. Gallegos, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: RS of drugs doesn’t automatically mean “armed and dangerous”