Daily Archives: April 20, 2019

S.D.Fla.: Younger abstention bars a § 1983 case over the search of plaintiff while the state criminal case is pending

Younger abstention bars a § 1983 case over the search of plaintiff while the state criminal case is pending. Ford v. Brookins, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66694 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 19, 2019). Qualified immunity was properly denied based on the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Younger abstention bars a § 1983 case over the search of plaintiff while the state criminal case is pending

CA1 again holds that IP information is third party information not governed by Carpenter

First Circuit again holds that IP information is third party information not governed by Carpenter. United States v. Morel, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 11457 (1st Cir. Apr. 19, 2019):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA1 again holds that IP information is third party information not governed by Carpenter

CO: Age is a factor in the voluntariness of consent; here a juvenile

Age is a factor in the voluntariness of consent. Here, it was a juvenile and the evidence supports the finding of consent. People in interest of B.D., 2019 COA 57, 2019 Colo. App. LEXIS 553 (Apr. 18, 2019). The only … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CO: Age is a factor in the voluntariness of consent; here a juvenile

E.D.Mo.: CLSI warrant obtained 3½ years before Carpenter was clearly with PC

The CLSI search warrant was obtained 3½ years before Carpenter, and assuming for the sake of argument that a warrant was required. It clearly showed probable cause to get the information. United States v. Johnson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65896 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: CLSI warrant obtained 3½ years before Carpenter was clearly with PC

MO: Warrantless blood draw from unresponsive person requires SW [issue also pending in SCOTUS]

The warrantless blood draw here was without exigent circumstances. The state instead relies on state statute, which the court finds a warrantless blood draw from an unresponsive person violates the Fourth Amendment. State v. Osborn, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 542 … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on MO: Warrantless blood draw from unresponsive person requires SW [issue also pending in SCOTUS]