Daily Archives: April 8, 2019

New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online

New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online by Wayne A. Logan & Jake Linford, Minnesota Law Review, Forthcoming: Abstract:

Posted in Social media warrants | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Contracting for Fourth Amendment Privacy Online

LA1: Plain view during a probation “compliance check” is valid

Plain view during a probation “compliance check” is valid. State v. Cheramie, 2019 La. App. LEXIS 576 (La. App. 1 Cir. Apr. 5, 2019). Defense counsel filed a motion to suppress which was heard and denied. He then pled guilty. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA1: Plain view during a probation “compliance check” is valid

OH8: When on probation for bestiality, the Humane Society can conduct probation searches

Defendant was on misdemeanor probation for bestiality with a dog. He was subject to probation searches on reasonable suspicion for whether or not he had pets in the house, and the Animal Protection League (APL) is a part of the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH8: When on probation for bestiality, the Humane Society can conduct probation searches

CA6: Rule against warrantless housing inspection entries clearly established

Defendant police officers were properly granted summary judgment on plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claims regarding the validity of the warrants because probable cause supported two of the warrants and the third warrant was not so lacking in indicia of probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: Rule against warrantless housing inspection entries clearly established

S.D.N.Y.: SW over use of Instragram justifies SW for cell phone as source

Defendant’s alleged use of Instagram justifies a search warrant for his cell phone as the source of the usage. United States v. Sosa, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58467 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. 5, 2019):

Posted in Cell phones, Social media warrants | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW over use of Instragram justifies SW for cell phone as source

N.D.Ga.: Email tip to Swiss authorities that defs were coming by plane with cocaine wasn’t enough to make the US agents of Switzerland

“Second, Defendants assert that HSI agents ‘were substantially involved’ in the search and seizure by Swiss officials based solely upon an email that was sent by a HSI special agent to the Swiss police alerting them to the fact that … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Email tip to Swiss authorities that defs were coming by plane with cocaine wasn’t enough to make the US agents of Switzerland

OH2: Denial of motion for return of property affirmed on appeal for lack of a hearing transcript

Defendant’s motion for return of property was properly denied, but it’s because he failed to bring up a record of the hearing in the trial court. State v. White, 2019-Ohio-1264, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 1342 (2d Cir. Apr. 5, 2019).* … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH2: Denial of motion for return of property affirmed on appeal for lack of a hearing transcript

N.D.Miss.: There’s no right to counsel during execution of a SW where defendant isn’t arrested and being questioned

“Mr. Pillault also argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because he had no counsel present when his home was searched. This claim is simply frivolous.” Pillault v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58295 (N.D. Miss. Apr. 4, … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: There’s no right to counsel during execution of a SW where defendant isn’t arrested and being questioned

IN: Petition for return of firearms seized granted; state’s evidence too stale to carry burden

In a petition for return of firearms seized from an alleged dangerous person, the state didn’t put on proof of anything recent, so the petition should have been granted. Redington v. State, 2019 Ind. App. LEXIS 146 (Apr. 5, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on IN: Petition for return of firearms seized granted; state’s evidence too stale to carry burden

CA2: Failure to make an offer of proof in motion to suppress means denial of the motion

“For starters, Ferrer was not entitled to a hearing on his motion to suppress. The motion, filed by counsel, was unaccompanied by any affidavit to support the charge that Ferrer was subjected to ‘an unlawful police-initiated interrogation.’ Gov’t App’x 2. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to make an offer of proof in motion to suppress means denial of the motion

WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE

The exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions under 1958 Plymouth Sedan; however, the state gets to argue and develop a record on remand that the good faith exception applies. State v. Scott, 2019 Wisc. App. LEXIS 191 (Apr. 4, 2019). … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Exclusionary rule applies to forfeiture actions; remanded for determination of GFE