Category Archives: Particularity

CA9: SW was wholesale overbroad, and QI not properly preserved for appeal

“The Second Search Warrant authorized, among other things, without any limitation as to time, the seizure of a vast array of ‘[f]inancial information’ related to Mr. Moore and ‘associated businesses’ that constitute evidence of a crime and all electronics that … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: SW was wholesale overbroad, and QI not properly preserved for appeal

TN: Typo of street number of location of car to be searched could be overlooked when the car was still parked

Defendant was a suspect in a vehicular homicide. Her car with pedestrian damage was found parked in the driveway of her house at 207 Port Drive in Hamilton County. There was a typo on the street number despite the warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Typo of street number of location of car to be searched could be overlooked when the car was still parked

NY4: No limitation in cell phone search was included, and it was thus not particular

The cell phone warrant sought all information on it about a 48 hour period without limitation, and it was vague and overbroad. “The warrant contained no language incorporating any other documents or facts. Significantly, the search of the phone was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on NY4: No limitation in cell phone search was included, and it was thus not particular

D.Conn.: Apparent overbreadth in SW cured by GFE on how it was executed and on what

The search warrant didn’t specify the crime under investigation and that was a problem for particularity. That could have been cured by the affidavit being attached to the warrant at execution but it wasn’t. It was referred to in the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Apparent overbreadth in SW cured by GFE on how it was executed and on what

D.D.C.: Second thoughts about unobjected to Facebook posts in 1/6 trial doesn’t mean govt violated particularity

1/6 defendants didn’t object to Facebook materials obtained by search warrant. In their motion for new trial they’re concerned with one entry in 14,000 pages that the government must have exceeded the warrant. “Even if these underdeveloped allegations held water, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Second thoughts about unobjected to Facebook posts in 1/6 trial doesn’t mean govt violated particularity

N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

The warrant was particular when it showed a picture of the premises with the address. The photograph showed the detached garage on the curtilage. That was covered by the warrant, too. When the government raised standing in response to defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

E.D.Mich.: SW for entire iCloud account limited by crime under investigation was particular

The fact the CI related information that was publicly known doesn’t support the story. “Although the Court concludes that the Apple/iCloud warrant was not supported by probable cause, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.” The case was a … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: SW for entire iCloud account limited by crime under investigation was particular

Cal.2: Geofence warrant issued before any case law showed PC, particularly, and good faith

Geofence warrant issued in 2019 before there were any reported cases satisfied probable cause, particularity, and the good faith exception. Price v. Superior Court, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 505 (2d Dist. July 3, 2023):

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on Cal.2: Geofence warrant issued before any case law showed PC, particularly, and good faith

D.Mont.: Nervousness alone not enough to extend stop

Defendant’s stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. A DL and EPIC check on both driver and passenger came up clean, and the stop should have ended then. Nervousness alone wasn’t enough. United States v. Funk, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Nervousness alone not enough to extend stop

MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

The court of appeals erred in not applying Terry to this frisk inside defendant’s coat, instead relying on plain feel. Remanded. People v. Turner, 2023 Mich. LEXIS 937 (June 21, 2023). “Here, the warrant specifically identified the offenses for which … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

The search warrant might appear general, but it was limited by the things to be searched for. The reference to “trace evidence including but not limited to blood, hair, fibers, fluids, and fingerprints” did not make it unparticular. Trace evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

The order to a motorist to lower his window is not a search, despite the fact the windows were heavily tinted and it made the interior more visible. Two pounds of cannabis on the car seat was probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Order to roll down heavily tinted car window is not a search

E.D.Mich.: No REP in attorney-client communication in jail 8′ from jailer

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment complaint that attorney-client communications in jail were overheard does not survive summary judgment. He was a mere eight feet from the jailer who could clearly overhear everything. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No REP in attorney-client communication in jail 8′ from jailer

CA9: Joint Cambodian-U.S. search unlawful under Cambodian law not unlawful here; exclusionary rule not applied

Defendant was the subject of a joint raid in Cambodia by local and U.S. officers. The search of defendant’s room was held unlawful under Cambodian law because there was no written consent of the owner, something with no counterpart in … Continue reading

Posted in Conflict of laws, Exclusionary rule, Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: Joint Cambodian-U.S. search unlawful under Cambodian law not unlawful here; exclusionary rule not applied

CA2: Is the SW description for electronic data “the best that could reasonably be expected under the circumstances”

In a warrant for electronic data, “the Fourth Amendment does not demand ‘a perfect description of the data to be searched and seized.’ … Rather, ‘some ambiguity’ is permitted ‘so long as law enforcement agents have done the best that … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, E-mail, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Is the SW description for electronic data “the best that could reasonably be expected under the circumstances”

CA2: GFE applies to particularity of SWs too

The good faith exception applies to particularity questions where the officer cannot reasonably be expected to question the scope of the warrant. United States v. Walker, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 11798 (2d Cir. May 15, 2023). “Given that a police … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: GFE applies to particularity of SWs too

N.D.Ga.: This is not an “all records” warrant; it was limited to mostly activities in Ethiopia

This was not an “all records” search warrant. It was limited to evidence of defendant’s “affiliation and association with” civilian militias in Ethiopia and that he was indicted and convicted in absentia there. United States v. Belayneh, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: This is not an “all records” warrant; it was limited to mostly activities in Ethiopia

NY Albany: SW’s problematic time limits support severability

The time limits on the scope of the warrant are problematic, but severable. People v. Williams, 2023 NY Slip Op 23137, 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2165 (Albany Co. May 8, 2023).* In a sex trafficking case, probable cause was shown … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY Albany: SW’s problematic time limits support severability

D.Kan.: “Indicia of ownership” in a SW not overbroad

Inclusion of “indicia of ownership” of the place searched doesn’t show the warrant was not particular. United States v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73033 (D. Kan. Apr. 26, 2023). Defendant was stopped for a traffic violation, although there was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “Indicia of ownership” in a SW not overbroad