Category Archives: State constitution

HI: Miranda warnings required whenever PC develops for arrest

“Miranda warnings are required by article I, section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Hawai’i when probable cause to arrest has developed. And in Hewitt’s case, contrary to the ICA’s conclusion, probable cause had developed before she was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Custody, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Miranda warnings required whenever PC develops for arrest

WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

Defendant’s freedom under the state constitution to not be interfered with in his private affairs was violated by a stop and inquiry whether he had paid a transit fare. He provided a false name that led to his prosecution for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

VT: Realtime CSLI (“pinging”) requires a SW under state constitution

Realtime CSLI (“pinging”) requires a search warrant under the state constitution, following some states. That information is not regularly kept by cell phone providers, and the state has an interest in protecting that privacy interest. State v. Murphy, 2023 VT … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, State constitution, Uncategorized | Comments Off on VT: Realtime CSLI (“pinging”) requires a SW under state constitution

OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

The state could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search. State v. Roberts, 2023-Ohio-142, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 131 (6th Dist. Jan. 18, 2023). The facts in isolation may not show reasonable suspicion but … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

The state 1971 constitutional amendment recognizing a right to privacy was really enacting what the people always believed about privacy. It provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Prison and jail searches, State constitution, Strip search | Comments Off on SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee

Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee. Plaintiff sued in federal court for a strip search going into a prison that produced nothing and also resulted in her being barred … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Nexus, State constitution | Comments Off on Nevada recognizes a private right of action for violation of the state constitution’s search and seizure guarantee

DC: “Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern.”

“Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern. See United States v. Smith, 373 F. Supp. 3d 223, 241 (D.D.C. 2019); Haynes v. Minnehan, 14 F.4th 830, 835 n.4 (8th Cir. 2021) (‘[A]bsent an objective … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on DC: “Handcuffing is ordinarily improper in a Terry stop absent an objective safety concern.”

IN rejects Heien under state constitution

Indiana rejects Heien under the state constitution. It is incongruous to justify a stop when the law shouldn’t even allow it. Mercado v. State, 2022 Ind. App. LEXIS 377 (Nov. 23, 2022):

Posted in Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on IN rejects Heien under state constitution

DC: Gant search incident for open containers did not permit search of a small plastic box

A Gant search incident of a vehicle authorized for open containers of alcohol didn’t permit a more intense search of a plastic “otter box” finding PCP. Smith v. United States, 2022 D.C. App. LEXIS 326 (Sep. 29, 2022). The state … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on DC: Gant search incident for open containers did not permit search of a small plastic box

IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

Failure to articulate one’s argument that the state constitution requires a different result is waiver. State v. Versteegh, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 434 (June 15, 2022). “Here, the issuing judge reasonably concluded, based on all of the circumstances, that there … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

WA: A detainee’s racial and ethnic factors are a part of “all the circumstances” in determining a seizure under state constitution

Under the state constitution, whether a person is “seized” must consider the person’s racial and ethnic factors that influence their perceptions. State v. Sum, 2022 Wash. LEXIS 317 (June 9, 2022):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: A detainee’s racial and ethnic factors are a part of “all the circumstances” in determining a seizure under state constitution

OK: Exclusionary rule applies in civil cases under state constitution

The exclusionary rule applies to Oklahoma City’s effort to enforce a warrantless entry to seize and forfeit birds in apparent distress. Oklahoma applies the exclusionary rule in most civil cases under its state constitutional provision against unreasonable searches. There was … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on OK: Exclusionary rule applies in civil cases under state constitution

IN: State const’l arguments have to be raised in trial court first

Defendant’s argument for a change in standing law under the state constitution that he should have the ability to challenge the search of another person’s person and clothing wasn’t raised below, so it’s waived. State v. Allen, 2022 Ind. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Overbreadth, Reasonableness, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on IN: State const’l arguments have to be raised in trial court first

OR: Asking juror question about refusal of consent was error, but here harmless

Oregon permits juror questions, and here one asked whether defendant willingly provided a DNA sample. Asking it on the record all amounted to error, but under plain error review, with other evidence in the case, it’s not reversible. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Asking juror question about refusal of consent was error, but here harmless

NM: Traffic arrest by reserve deputy in violation of statute violates state constitution

Where the legislature requires traffic arrests be made by uniformed, sworn, and salaried officers, arrest by a reserve deputy violates the state constitution. State v. Wright, 2022 N.M. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 10, 2022). “The Court finds that Mr. Hunley was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Traffic arrest by reserve deputy in violation of statute violates state constitution

OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

Oregon Supreme Court holds that the exigency for an automobile exception search under the state constitution must actually exist at the time of the search. The per se rule from 1986’s Brown case is overruled. Technological changes and statute since … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

N.D.Cal.: Rule 41(g) is for return of things, not suppression of evidence

Rule 41(g) is only for return of seized things, and it can’t be used to suppress evidence, especially in a state court. Christie v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231113 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 2, 2021). Defendant’s motion to suppress cites … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, State constitution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Rule 41(g) is for return of things, not suppression of evidence

D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

Defendant’s flight from the police and abandonment of items in flight was not while he was “seized.” Thus, the need to decide reasonable suspicion for a stop is obviated. United States v. Sockwell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215294 (D.Conn. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

NJ: Flagrant knock-and-announce violation requires suppression under state constitution

A flagrant violation of the knock-and-announce rule violates the state constitution and the result is excluded. Violating the knock-and-announce requirement makes the search warrantless. The court recognizes the Fourth Amendment rule is contra. State v. Caronna, 2021 N.J. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ: Flagrant knock-and-announce violation requires suppression under state constitution

VT: Roving CBP patrol stop one mile from Canadian border violated state const. even though probably not 4A

A roving border patrol stop a mile from the Canadian border led to state charges against defendant. The court holds the state constitution was violated even if the Fourth Amendment was not, and the evidence should be suppressed. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Immigration checkpoints, State constitution | Comments Off on VT: Roving CBP patrol stop one mile from Canadian border violated state const. even though probably not 4A