Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

Being tried and acquitted of murder, plaintiff sued the police who arrested her. She had an affirmative defense which led to the acquittal. Failure to present conclusive evidence of an affirmative defense to the issuing magistrate would be a probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: In seeking arrest warrants, officers need not present all exculpatory evidence to issuing magistrate unless it’s “conclusive”

S.D.Ohio: DEA agents tailing a car can request marked unit to make a traffic stop for violations they saw

DEA agents following defendant in an unmarked car observed traffic violations, and they requested a marked unit to make a stop, which was valid. United States v. Peterson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90905 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 24, 2026).* A state … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: DEA agents tailing a car can request marked unit to make a traffic stop for violations they saw

E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

The CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved isn’t really a Franks violation. United States v. Mooneyham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67746 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2026). Plaintiff reasonably believed that one of the officers was sitting on him … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

E.D.Mo.: Ubiquity of cell phones here satisfied nexus without stating it

This is about a search warrant issued in an arson investigation and defendant’s claim of lack of nexus. The ubiquity of cell phones means that the officers did not even have to state that they knew defendant had one. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Ubiquity of cell phones here satisfied nexus without stating it

D.N.M.: Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but QI applies

Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but qualified immunity applies because the law isn’t clearly established. Dotson v. Acord, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57749 (D.N.M. Mar. 19, 2026). Plaintiff runs a wildlife rehab place, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but QI applies

D.Mass.: Apt’s breezeway is curtilage, but officers get qualified immunity

The court concludes that plaintiff’s apartment’s breezeway is curtilage, but the officers get qualified immunity because there’s no case on point. They remained there after being told to leave. Sabey v. Butterfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52309 (D. Mass. Mar. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Apt’s breezeway is curtilage, but officers get qualified immunity

CA11: QI in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial

Qualified immunity in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial without it being waived. Edwards v. Grubbs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7500 (11th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026). “However, Groth must show not only that the officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: QI in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial

CA7: Use of force during book-in here was subject to QI

Officers get qualified immunity for arrestee who was alleged to have resisted booking and was removed, while handcuffed behind his back, to an intake cell with a concrete bed, and he hit the floor with his face when “pushed” down. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Use of force during book-in here was subject to QI

CA10: Ptfs pled enough to get past QI on PC showing for social media warrant

Plaintiffs pled enough to overcome qualified immunity that the search warrants at issue here were objectively without probable cause including a social media warrant. Armendariz v. City of Colo. Springs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7362 (10th Cir. Mar. 12, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on CA10: Ptfs pled enough to get past QI on PC showing for social media warrant

NYCo.: Arrests can’t be suppressed

“Defendant was charged with committing specific acts of violence against an identifiable person, who reported the incident. An arrest itself cannot be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree, and defendant himself was not a suppressible fruit. Nor was he … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYCo.: Arrests can’t be suppressed

CA8: Police with arrest warrant could enter third-party premises to arrest defendant

Police with a warrant for defendant could enter a third party’s premises to arrest him on probable cause that he was present. Under Steagald, defendant had no more reasonable expectation of privacy in the third party’s premises than the owner … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Police with arrest warrant could enter third-party premises to arrest defendant

Two on qualified immunity

“The Anders point to no case holding that officers violated the Fourth Amendment in the process of levying property pursuant to a valid writ of execution. ‘For search and seizure claims, the Supreme Court has cautioned that “courts should define … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on Two on qualified immunity

D.D.C.: Illegal search on stop tainted consent

“On August 12, 2025, seven U.S. Marshals partially surrounded Defendant Judge Alston’s car over a minor parking violation. The Government concedes that before Alston gave any consent, a Marshal began illegally searching his car. Because that initial illegal search both … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Illegal search on stop tainted consent

TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

Failure to allege what should have been suppressed if a motion to suppress had been filed is fatal to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Coyne v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 104 (Mar. 3, 2026). Qualified immunity denied: … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Failure to allege what should have been suppressed defeats IAC claim

W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over. Harris v. Trent, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42416 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2026). “Here, assuming the factual disputes in Franke’s favor, the relevant question is whether it was clearly established … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Younger doctrine didn’t apply when plaintiff’s criminal case was over

E.D.Cal.: Excessive damage in executing writ of possession can state claim

Excessive damage in executing a writ of possession can state a Fourth Amendment claim. Dayton v. Fairfield Mobile Home, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41228 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2026). Vehicle finance company’s Fourth Amendment claim against the village’s retention of … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Excessive damage in executing writ of possession can state claim

D.N.M.: Suit over search in pending criminal case barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s first Fourth Amendment claim failed under Heck. He amended the complaint and still doesn’t overcome it. His claim of failure to train in serving search warrants is conclusory and doesn’t state a claim either. Flores v. Wood, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Suit over search in pending criminal case barred by Heck

GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

Private search: Defendant let someone use his computer and that person found two incriminating letters which were turned over to the police. Bunn v. State, 2026 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Feb. 25, 2026).* The parties agreed that references to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Private search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: Def let someone use his computer, and they found letters they turned over to the police in a private search

CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

Plaintiff didn’t sufficiently plead a Fourth Amendment violation and overcoming qualified immunity from the officer’s seizing his notebook and perusing it and handing it to another officer. It’s his burden to deal with qualified immunity, and he didn’t adequately respond. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf has burden to adequately respond to 4A qualified immunity claim when made by defense

CA8: No QI for nearly point black shooting protestor in eye with less than lethal device

Shooting a protestor in the eye at point blank range with a “less than lethal” device that the officers are trained on and warned can actually be lethal was excessive force. No qualified immunity. Marks v. Bauer, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: No QI for nearly point black shooting protestor in eye with less than lethal device