Category Archives: Qualified immunity

CA8: Minor child could consent to search and seizure of camera hidden in her bathroom

This court rejects the notion that a minor never has the apparent authority to consent to a search, here of a camera in the house. The minor was defendant’s 14-year-old daughter, and defendant and the mother had visitation. She found … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: Minor child could consent to search and seizure of camera hidden in her bathroom

CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition

The business’s petition for return of records obtained by search warrant and grand jury subpoena is denied. The business’s principal is still litigating his criminal case and a 2255 is pending, and that justifies it. Allen v. Grist Mill Capital … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition

W.D.Wis.: No habeas relief for unlawful arrest

That 2254 petitioner’s state arrest was unreasonable doesn’t state grounds for relief from a conviction. Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 306, 321 (1983). Ramirez v. Meisner, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218142 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 6, 2023). Defendant had no standing … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: No habeas relief for unlawful arrest

CA5: Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity

Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity. “On the well-pleaded facts of this case, Walls was not suspected of any crime, posed no immediate threat to the safety of the deputies or others, and made no attempt … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity

LA2: Arrest allegedly in violation of 4A leads to officer’s indictment, which is quashed because of justification

The officer here was charged with malfeasance in office for violating the Fourth Amendment by handcuffing a detainee for whom he was told there was an arrest warrant after he revoked consent to search: “I have someone you can talk … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA2: Arrest allegedly in violation of 4A leads to officer’s indictment, which is quashed because of justification

LA: Def’s lie about living in place to be searched helped GFE to apply to overcome staleness

The trial court and court of appeals both erred in finding that the affidavit for search warrant was “so lacking” in probable cause that the good faith exception should not apply. “The affidavit accompanying the search warrant application explained the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on LA: Def’s lie about living in place to be searched helped GFE to apply to overcome staleness

DC: Search of probationer’s GPS monitor didn’t require a SW

Defendant was on GPS electronic monitoring while on probation. The search of his EM device to prove he was involved in a robbery was not unreasonable. Moreover, even if the probation department’s regulations were somehow violated, the exclusionary rule should … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on DC: Search of probationer’s GPS monitor didn’t require a SW

OH8: Extraterritorial stop by LEO doesn’t violate 4A, and exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

An extraterritorial stop by an officer does not violate the Fourth Amendment. The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations, here especially because of public safety concerns. City of Fairview Park v. Bowman, 2023-Ohio-4210, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4047 (8th … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH8: Extraterritorial stop by LEO doesn’t violate 4A, and exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

Merely scrolling through an electronic device at the border is a reasonable border search. United States v. Vrdoljak, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208332 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2023). The officer was incidentally following defendant, and he observed her driving within … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

CA11: The bodycam video showed the altercation with ptf and hospital security was reasonable

The bodycam video of plaintiff’s altercation with two hospital security guards showed they were entitled to qualified immunity. Scott v. Harris. Bouvier v. City of Covington, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 30822 (11th Cir. Nov. 20, 2023).* In excessive force cases, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: The bodycam video showed the altercation with ptf and hospital security was reasonable

CA6: SW’s minor error in naming place to be searched did not entitle ptf to relief; qualified immunity applies

A minor error in the address of the place to be searched could be overlooked because only the right place was searched. There is still qualified immunity. Neal El v. Valasek, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 30000 (6th Cir. Nov. 9, … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nexus, Particularity, Pretext, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA6: SW’s minor error in naming place to be searched did not entitle ptf to relief; qualified immunity applies

N.D.Ga.: SW for defendant’s email to show his and others’ state of mind at time of crime was not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s email accounts to show where he was when he accessed it, “evidence relating to the planning, execution, furtherance and/or concealment of the crimes under investigation,” and his “and other participants’ state of mind as it … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: SW for defendant’s email to show his and others’ state of mind at time of crime was not overbroad

E.D.N.Y.: Police officer’s drug test while on sick leave for work injury was justified by RS

Plaintiff is a Suffolk County police officer on work-related sick leave. He was ordered to take a drug test while off, and the court finds it a search and done on reasonable suspicion. Volpe v. Ryder, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Police officer’s drug test while on sick leave for work injury was justified by RS

NY3: Motion to suppress is an adequate remedy at law, not a writ of prohibition

Defendant sought prohibition to prevent his prosecution because of an illegal search. He has an adequate remedy in a motion to suppress. Denied. Matter of Rodriguez v. Hobbs, 2023 NY Slip Op 05433,2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5399 (3d Dept. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY3: Motion to suppress is an adequate remedy at law, not a writ of prohibition

CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

The affidavit and supplementing testimony provided substantial probable cause for issuance of the warrant. State law requires any testimony supplementing a search warrant affidavit be preserved and transcribed. The state issuing magistrate failed. The officer, however, acted in good faith, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Immigration arrests, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

IL: In this forfeiture seizure, the car could not be inventoried; contents were to be returned to the owner

Officers attempted a stop of a vehicle potentially involved in an earlier occurrence. Instead of stopping, the driver fled from the stop in the car. Instead of pursuing, officers had the LPN and went to where it was registered, and … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Forfeiture, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on IL: In this forfeiture seizure, the car could not be inventoried; contents were to be returned to the owner

M.D.Pa.: State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254

State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254. McDowell v. Hainesworth, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187496 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2023). Petitioner doesn’t get a CoA to appeal his 2255. He provides no basis for concluding … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254

CA3: SoL for illegal search claims not tolled by incarcerated

Plaintiff inmate’s statute of limitations for an illegal search claim starts when he should be aware of the claim and it is not tolled while he is incarcerated. Poteat v. Lydon, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26961 (3d Cir. Oct. 11, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: SoL for illegal search claims not tolled by incarcerated

CA8: Continuation of arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer QI

Continuation of plaintiff’s arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer qualified immunity. “Even if we concluded Officer Holtan made a reasonable mistake about probable cause when he first tackled Nieters to the ground, Nieters immediately informed … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Continuation of arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer QI

D.Mont.: Def’s interest in his package is a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time

When a package in transit is detained for investigation, the person named on the package has an interest in a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time. United States v. Hamlin, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180215 (D. Mont. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def’s interest in his package is a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time