Category Archives: Franks doctrine

CA10: City driveway shared with house next door not curtilage

A driveway shared with the house next door was not curtilage. A driveway in a city usually isn’t anyway. United States v. Vasquez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 75 (10th Cir. Jan. 3, 2024). Defendant’s objection to the R&R that the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on CA10: City driveway shared with house next door not curtilage

D.N.M.: Squatter in building labeled “unsafe” had no standing

Defendant was a squatter in a building with posted sign warning it was substandard and unsafe. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises. United States v. Guzman, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 550 (D.N.M. Jan. 2, 2024). Michael … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Squatter in building labeled “unsafe” had no standing

LA5: Omission wasn’t material for Franks and it was only negligent, if anything

“There is no evidence to demonstrate that any omission of Mr. Daleo’s prior statement in the probable cause affidavits was intentional. Further, we find the applications demonstrate that the attesting officers had reasonable grounds to believe that defendant’s residence and … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA5: Omission wasn’t material for Franks and it was only negligent, if anything

E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. “At the hearing, Hill presented nothing to establish that this inconsistency was anything other than a negligent typographical error. While he maintained that the affidavits were riddled with falsehoods, he was unable—despite repeated questioning—to pinpoint any … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

GA: A court order for medical records by statute requires PC

There is a statutory privacy interest in one’s medical records, and an “appropriate court order” is required for the government to access them in a criminal case. An ex parte order not shown to be based on probable cause is … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: A court order for medical records by statute requires PC

M.D.Pa.: Cut-and-paste errors and delay in execution and discovery results in suppression of cell phone

A Franks violation from cut-and-paste of another cell phone search affidavit resulted in serious factual errors in this one. Coupled with the government’s late disclosure of the phone’s contents despite a date certain trial, the court concludes the exclusionary rule … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Cut-and-paste errors and delay in execution and discovery results in suppression of cell phone

CA4: 2255 pet’r gets discovery and evidentiary hearing on “dirty cop” the govt both embraced and disavowed at its convenience

2255 petitioner gets an evidentiary hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea after he discovered the affiant, who he’d previously complained to all was a “dirty cop,” actually lied on the search warrant affidavit back in 2015. At … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: 2255 pet’r gets discovery and evidentiary hearing on “dirty cop” the govt both embraced and disavowed at its convenience

D.Haw.: Def’s use of known alias to rent property gave standing

Rental of storage unit in one of defendant’s known aliases gave him standing. United States v. Eberhart, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222575 (D. Haw. Dec. 14, 2023). Defendant’s Franks challenge fails for lack of the proffer of good reason. Aside … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Def’s use of known alias to rent property gave standing

D.N.J.: Expert saying drug dog not reliable not a Franks issue

Defendant’s expert report that the drug dog here wasn’t reliable doesn’t make a Franks challenge. Besides, there was good faith as to it. United States v. Estevez-Castillo, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221601 (D.N.J. Dec. 13, 2023). That officers created the … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Knock and talk | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Expert saying drug dog not reliable not a Franks issue

D.S.D.: Def’s lies to police during arrest completely undermines his credibility in a pro se Franks challenge

Defendant pro se makes allegations of a Franks violation but nothing substantive is offered for the “substantial preliminary showing.” Moreover, because he lied to the officers during his arrest, the court finds him without credibility. United States v. Ward, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Franks doctrine, Strip search | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s lies to police during arrest completely undermines his credibility in a pro se Franks challenge

NY1: Def’s Franks challenge denial and 7 year sentence summarily affirmed 7½ years later

“Defendant’s request for a Franks hearing was properly summarily denied. He failed to make a ‘substantial preliminary showing’ that the purported statements he made to his wife and at the precinct relating to his ownership of the vehicle were false … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY1: Def’s Franks challenge denial and 7 year sentence summarily affirmed 7½ years later

MD: False information in cold case arrest warrant suppresses statement made on arrest

17-year-old information from an admittedly unreliable CI who had the information two-three years before telling in 2008 coupled with a false statement in an affidavit for warrant about an identification that was just wrong did not provide probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MD: False information in cold case arrest warrant suppresses statement made on arrest

OH5: Put the affidavit for SW in the record at the suppression hearing

The affidavit for search warrant isn’t in the record on appeal, so the court presumes the regularity of proceedings in the trial court. The record that was made shows that there was probable cause. State v. Hill, 2023-Ohio-4381, 2023 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: Put the affidavit for SW in the record at the suppression hearing

CA6: Recently discovered alleged Franks violation not sufficient for successor habeas petition

Even if there was a recently discovered Franks violation in the underlying search warrant affidavit that produced evidence against defendant, that doesn’t satisfy the standard for a successor habeas petition. In re Rooks, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 31471 (6th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Recently discovered alleged Franks violation not sufficient for successor habeas petition

CT: SW mentioned in a police report wasn’t Brady information

An FBI 302 mentioned a search warrant, and all of this in context did not amount to a Brady violation. Reyes v. State, 2023 Conn. App. LEXIS 272 (Nov. 28, 2023). “We conclude, based on the record, that the district … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CT: SW mentioned in a police report wasn’t Brady information

W.D.N.Y.: If feds never get property from state, no Rule 41(g) jurisdiction over it

Federal court has no Rule 41(g) jurisdiction over seized and held property by state officials never transferred to federal custody. United States v. Gonzalez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210395 (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2023). Defendant’s Franks challenge fails: “In conclusion, the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: If feds never get property from state, no Rule 41(g) jurisdiction over it

TX7: Four county highspeed chase was RS

Defendant’s argument failed that a license plate reader hit couldn’t provide a basis for a stop when he went on a four county highspeed chase when the police tried to stop him. Landers v. State, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 8817 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX7: Four county highspeed chase was RS

PA: Car and phone were abandoned after police chase

Defendant was allegedly driving his car, fled a police stop and crashed into another car. He fled and abandoned the car leaving his cell phone inside. He reported it stolen the next morning, but that proved to be false. The … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on PA: Car and phone were abandoned after police chase

AR: Probation search waiver can be required in suspended sentences, too

The state probation search waiver statute doesn’t refer to suspended sentences, but the court has the power to impose it there, too, even without a supervision requirement. Johnson v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 509 (Nov. 8, 2023). The dog sniff … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AR: Probation search waiver can be required in suspended sentences, too

CA4: Clerk’s failure to file and stamp warrants not a 4A violation

The alleged failure of the clerk of court to file and stamp warrants was not a Fourth Amendment claim for a § 1983 case. Jordan v. Newman, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766 (4th Cir. Nov. 8, 2023). The taking of … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Clerk’s failure to file and stamp warrants not a 4A violation