Category Archives: Franks doctrine

NY1: SW misdescription of place to be searched not adequately resolved below; remanded

Defendant’s motion to suppress based on an apparent misdescription of the place to be searched wasn’t resolved below, so the case is remanded for further development. People v. Trulove, 2025 NY Slip Op 01178, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1170 … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: SW misdescription of place to be searched not adequately resolved below; remanded

CA5: Officer’s responding to “open structure call” and entering was reasonable as community caretaking function

“When Dean responded to the ‘open structure call’ he was performing a community caretaking function. Community caretaking functions are ‘totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.’ … Here, even … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s responding to “open structure call” and entering was reasonable as community caretaking function

CA4: Withheld discovery information about CIs in SW affidavit justified setting aside guilty plea

Defendant’s guilty plea is set aside as a due process as a result of the government withholding information about a second CI in the search warrant papers where the first couldn’t identify him. When the government made a later 775-page … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: Withheld discovery information about CIs in SW affidavit justified setting aside guilty plea

legalai.com: Evidence Excluded In Murder Case for Failure to Disclose AI Use [from apparent Franks violation]

legalai.com: Evidence Excluded In Murder Case for Failure to Disclose AI Use by Dean Taylor (Feb 17, 2025). The affidavit for warrant obscured that facial recognition powered by AI was used to identify the accused, stating in the motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on legalai.com: Evidence Excluded In Murder Case for Failure to Disclose AI Use [from apparent Franks violation]

S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

The government says it doesn’t intend to use challenged evidence, so the motion to suppress is moot. If the government changes its mind, defendant can reassert it. United States v. Combs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25641 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Mootness, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

OR: Officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable

The officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable. State v. Starr, 337 Or. App. 682 (Feb. 12, 2025).* There was probable cause to believe blood on the cell phone was defendant’s justifying the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable

CA8: False statement van was “secured” was based on secondhand information and was neither material or reckless

The officer’s statement that defendant’s van was “secured” was not sufficient false and misleading to even be reckless. The officer was passing on information from other officers about the van, but the windows were missing and it was accessible. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: False statement van was “secured” was based on secondhand information and was neither material or reckless

OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

Officers had reasonable suspicion to initiate a brief investigative stop of defendant based on the totality of the circumstances, including the citizen’s tip, the late hour, the location, and the defendant’s suspicious behavior upon seeing them. Placing him in the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

CA11: Potential new Franks violation not enough for third successor habeas

This is petitioner’s third successor habeas attempt. This one claims new information might make a Franks violation. Except that it doesn’t qualify for permission to proceed as a successor. In re Obeginski, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806 (11th Cir. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Potential new Franks violation not enough for third successor habeas

CA5: There was enough here to support GFE; Franks challenge failed

There at least was some showing of probable cause for the warrant here and the good faith exception applies. He also argued a Franks violation for a misstated fact, but even the best spin on that supports materiality and probable … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: There was enough here to support GFE; Franks challenge failed

OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

The officer’s briefly touching the vehicle’s exterior to redirect the canine’s focus did not constitute a search. The dog’s certification and training were sufficient to establish its reliability, absent conflicting evidence from the defendant. This traffic stop was not unconstitutionally … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

CA8: Drugs on person admissible under 404(b) despite being outside indictment

Drugs on defendant’s person at the time of arrest were admissible under 404(b) despite being outside the time of the indictment. United States v. Hodo, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1796 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2025). Defendant was on supervised release … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Drugs on person admissible under 404(b) despite being outside indictment

GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

A search warrant for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs. State v. Johnson, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 18 (Jan. 28, 2025). Defendant was on supervised release and the search of his cell phone producing child pornography was reasonable. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

E.D.Mich.: Civil Franks violation was “well established” and QI denied

Plaintiff was arrested for child sexual abuse. The child recanted, and the prosecutor involved was disbarred for misconduct in this case. Plaintiff’s claim for a Franks violation was well established by 1978, and qualified immunity denied. MacMaster v. Busacca, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Civil Franks violation was “well established” and QI denied

NY Queens: Stop based solely on car description wasn’t with RS

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped solely because of its make and color with no other justification, and thus lacking reasonable suspicion. People v. Mitchell, 2025 NYLJ LEXIS 261 (Queens Co. Jan. 22, 2025).* The use of force here on a food … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Queens: Stop based solely on car description wasn’t with RS

VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

Defendant succeeded in his Franks challenge on misleading statements about the CI as an observer rather than participant in the crime and the affidavit lacked corroborating investigative facts and omitted information about W1’s lies. All this was material to the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

Defendant’s motion in limine about whether a search warrant was utilized is denied. The government can refer incidentally to the search. United States v. Djan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8285 (D.R.I. Jan. 10, 2025). Officers had reasonable suspicion for the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

TX: Judge sanctioned for blocking DNA testing of class A misdemeanants without authority

A former judge of the Harris County Criminal Court was sanctioned by the Texas Supreme Court for issuing orders of protection barring the Sheriff from taking DNA samples from class A misdemeanants because the judge believed the statute requiring it … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX: Judge sanctioned for blocking DNA testing of class A misdemeanants without authority

CA8: When there’s PC for a SW, standing doesn’t even have to be decided

In a tax fraud case, there were six search warrants. Defendants challenge them all. Standing was in dispute, but doesn’t even have to be decided because there clearly is probable cause for all six, despite the claim that one piece … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: When there’s PC for a SW, standing doesn’t even have to be decided

N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

A criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment. United States v. Sole, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2025).* Defendant’s stop for clearly overtinted windows was reasonable. Disagreement by witnesses over minor details didn’t matter. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment