Author Archives: Hall

PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

The protective sweep was valid, but it did not permit going into dresser drawers. Commonwealth v. Hightower, 2025 PA Super 129, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 277 (June 25, 2025); Commonwealth v. Layer, 2025 PA Super 128, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on PA: Protective sweep doesn’t permit searching dresser drawers

OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

The parole search of defendant’s place was still valid even though he was arrested outside. State v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-2216 (9th Dist. June 25, 2025). 2255 petitioner doesn’t show counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress because a suppression motion … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

“[T]he trial court was entitled to find that the questioning and free-air dog sniff were done concurrently with other tasks related to the mission of the traffic stop and therefore did not impermissibly prolong the stop.” Avant v. State, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

Plaintiff was at the wrong place at the wrong time of a threatened robbery. He was taken from his car at gunpoint and an officer held him down with a knee to the neck nearly asphyxiating him. While no case … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

“Maybe thirteen officers were not needed. Maybe the officers did not need to carry and display rifles. Maybe fewer vehicles could have been used to block Defendant’s vehicle. Maybe officers did not have to place Defendant in handcuffs because their … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Court won’t “second guess” 13 officers participating in vehicle stop and search

CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

The state requiring the taking of some blood from newborn infants for testing and keeping it did not constitute a seizure because plaintiffs proved no property interest. Parental consent is required for any later use. Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep’t of … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

The apartment building’s parking lot was not part of the curtilage. United States v. Isaac, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120584 (D. Kan. June 24, 2025). Defendant was wanted on a PV warrant. A warrant task force located a place he … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Apt building parking lot not curtilage

National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws

National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws by John R. Puri (but it just sounds like what Google collects for GPS traffic):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on National Review: Washington State to Use Drivers’ Cell Phone Data to Enforce Traffic Laws

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means by Shira Ovide:

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Digital privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Scanning technology is coming to detect child porn. Here’s what it means

S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

Using BitTorrent to access defendant’s open child pornography files peer-to-peer on his computer was not a digital trespass and did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ewing, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15437 (11th Cir. June 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Inventory, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

Defendant had standing to contest a search of this cell phone. While he didn’t attach an affidavit, the motion and other papers say it’s his, as does the consent form. Nothing suggests it’s not. The police got a warrant out … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Nexus, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Nexus to CSLI would show who had the phone to connect it to crime

IA: Fanny pack handed off to another on arrest was subject to search incident

On being arrested, defendant removed his fanny pack and handed it to another. It was still subject to search incident. State v. Scullark, 2025 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 74 (June 20, 2025):

Posted in Search incident | Comments Off on IA: Fanny pack handed off to another on arrest was subject to search incident

S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

It appears to this USMJ that the government is judge shopping. After denial of a warrant request, the government reapplied which was first assigned to another USMJ who transferred it here. Rejected again for the same reason. Defect not cured. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Judge shopping SW request noted, and denied again

TX4: State can’t rely on community caretaking function where it didn’t make a record below

The state couldn’t rely on the community caretaking function exception on appeal where it didn’t develop the record for it below. State v. Young, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 4196 (Tex. App. – San Antonio June 18, 2025). Defendant can’t make … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Community caretaking function, Probable cause, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX4: State can’t rely on community caretaking function where it didn’t make a record below

Reason: Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests

Reason: Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests by Autumn Billings (“Flock Safety’s 40,000 cameras present in over 5,000 communities across the U.S. are being used to detain undocumented immigrants, many of whom … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Immigration arrests, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests

N.D.Ill.: Particularity is a function of what’s known

“That said, specificity is ‘relative,’ and a warrant ‘need not be more specific than knowledge allows.’ United States v. Bishop, 910 F.3d 335, 338 (7th Cir. 2018). In other words, law enforcement is required to particularize a warrant only to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Particularity is a function of what’s known

TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to this warrant. He signed it but didn’t acknowledge swearing to it. “the Court of Criminal Appeals has specifically explained that ‘to convey the solemnity and critical … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Neutral and detached magistrate, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX5: Failure to swear an oath or affirmation before the issuing judge was fatal to warrant

Reason: Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids

Reason: Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids by Jacob Sullen (“Cops should not be free to forgo the modicum of care required to make sure they’re in the right place.”)

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: Federal Courts Shrug at Potentially Lethal Wrong-Door Raids

Reason: South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years

Reason: South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years by Rob Johnson & Daryl James (“Operation Rolling Thunder was an unconstitutional search-and-seizure machine that subjected thousands of innocent people to pretextual, warrantless searches. Public records show that … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years