Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

The unidentified tipster was corroborated by defendant’s hand-to-hand transactions during surveillance, and that was probable cause. United States v. Mangol, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130023 (W.D. Mo. May 23, 2025). Defendant sought to use the GPS information on his trailer … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Unidentified tipster corroborated by hand-to-hand transactions

S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

Giving a substantial amount of cash to a courier to take it from Arizona to Maryland doesn’t create standing. United States v. $549,860.00 in United States Currency, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131436 (S.D. Ill. July 10, 2025). Defendant’s place was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant, Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

Reasonable suspicion is required for a prison visitor’s strip search. Out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established. Here it essentially was. Gilmore v. Ga. Dept. of Corr., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17209 (11th … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: RS required for a prison visitor’s strip search; out of circuit authority can be considered in whether the law is clearly established

Mediate: Trump’s Border Czar Sparks Firestorm of Anger By Telling Fox News ICE Can Detain Based on ‘Physical Appearance’

Mediate: Trump’s Border Czar Sparks Firestorm of Anger By Telling Fox News ICE Can Detain Based on ‘Physical Appearance’ by Alex Griffing

Posted in Racial profiling | Comments Off on Mediate: Trump’s Border Czar Sparks Firestorm of Anger By Telling Fox News ICE Can Detain Based on ‘Physical Appearance’

The Scopes trial was 100 years ago today

LA Times: When Darrow took on Bryan 100 years ago today, science got the win. Or did it? by Randall Balmer

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Scopes trial was 100 years ago today

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the use of a cell phone in prison. United States v. Brandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129412 (N.D. Ga. June 13, 2025). This line in defendant’s PSR leads to denial of his … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonableness, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a prison inmate’s cell phone

W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

Filing a search warrant and application before it is served isn’t a constitutional requirement. [And even if it was, where’s the prejudice?] United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130063 (W.D. Wis. July 8, 2025):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: 4A doesn’t require filing SW and application before service

IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

On de novo review, the officers didn’t slow walk the traffic citation to get more time to do the dog sniff. State v. Cox, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 567 (July 2, 2025)*:

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Video shows officers didn’t slow walk traffic stop for dog sniff

Reclaim The Net: How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor

Reclaim The Net: How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor by Christina Maas (“The Supreme Court’s silence keeps 20th-century privacy rules firmly in place while 21st-century surveillance marches on.”). Well, to be frank, the third-party doctrine isn’t going anywhere as … Continue reading

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on Reclaim The Net: How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor

CA8: Social media video of SW target shooting guns justified no-knock entry

Social media videos of a target of the warrant shooting guns viewed before obtaining the warrant justified a no-knock warrant. Davenport v. City of Little Rock, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16540 (8th Cir. July 7, 2025). Plaintiff’s various claims, including … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce | Comments Off on CA8: Social media video of SW target shooting guns justified no-knock entry

OH12: Adoption of suppression motion brief by reference on appeal is waiver

Adoption of his suppression motion brief by reference without briefing it was waiver. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a conversation with his girlfriend in the presence of a CI. State v. Davis, 2025-Ohio-2382, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH12: Adoption of suppression motion brief by reference on appeal is waiver

OH5: Trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it

The trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it. State v. Reynolds, 2025-Ohio-2347, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 2332 (5th Dist. July 2, 2025). During the stop, the driver could be ordered out of the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing, Stop and frisk, Waiver | Comments Off on OH5: Trial court erred in finding no standing when the state didn’t even raise it

E.D.Wis.: Heck bar has to be pled in first defensive pleading

The Heck bar is an affirmative defense that has to be pled by defendants under F.R.C.P. 8(c). Megna v. Musial, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127980 (E.D. Wis. July 7, 2025). Defendant’s driving justified his stop. State v. Craven, 2025 Wash. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Heck bar has to be pled in first defensive pleading

CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

Defendant’s driveway was not curtilage, so his stop and ultimate search of the car was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Moses, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16484 (3d Cir. July 3, 2025). De minimis force, even … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

UT: Merely possible is not sufficient for inevitable discovery to apply

Merely possible is not sufficient for inevitable discovery to apply. State v. Abonza, 2025 UT App 101, 2025 Utah App. LEXIS 102 (July 3, 2025). Based on collective knowledge, there was probable cause for defendant’s stop. Morris v. State, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on UT: Merely possible is not sufficient for inevitable discovery to apply

OH: No REP in single location info entered into a phone app

Defendant’s single location information entered into a phone app that was used to set up a robbery was basic third-party information not protected by Carpenter. State v. Diaw, 2025-Ohio-2323 (July 2, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on OH: No REP in single location info entered into a phone app

E.D.Ark.: Reacting defensively to request for consent contributed to RS

[While it was thin,] The officer had reasonable suspicion for a dog sniff, including “react[ing] defensively when asked for consent to search the Sentra by making a facial expression, flailing his arms to the side, and offering unprompted explanations as … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Reacting defensively to request for consent contributed to RS

N.D.Iowa: USMJ recommends grant of motion to suppress; second SW to cure defects in first not proper for attenuation doctrine

The government admits that the warrant lacked particularity, but they sought to use the good faith exception to sustain a limited search. The problem there is that the person who sought the warrant didn’t search it, and he instructed the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: USMJ recommends grant of motion to suppress; second SW to cure defects in first not proper for attenuation doctrine

KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

A person accused has a statutory right of access to search warrant affidavits in his own case. “The applicable provisions state only that the documents ‘shall be made available’ to defendants ‘when requested,’ without specifying to whom the request should … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: There’s a statutory right of def to SW affidavits

W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

In this 2254, petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t object that the search warrant was not personally served on him wasn’t a constitutional requirement. Also barred by Stone. Witkowski v. Bennett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126262 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW