Author Archives: Hall

D.D.C.: Vague and unsupported allegations of 4A violation during pretrial crime scene walk through denied

Defendant is a pardoned Jan. 6th defendant who had a pretrial walk through at the Capitol in October 2024. He claims the AUSA and FBI tried to read his notes in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Despite his pardon, he … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Vague and unsupported allegations of 4A violation during pretrial crime scene walk through denied

CA1 oral argument on lobstering as heavily regulated

CNS: First Circuit unbothered by Maine’s lobster boat snooping by Thomas F. Harrison (“Because lobstering is heavily regulated, the judges seemed to think it’s OK to track the boats’ every move even when they’re used for other purposes.”)

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA1 oral argument on lobstering as heavily regulated

CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

The officer had reasonable suspicion that the owner of the vehicle had a suspended DL, but that dissipated when he saw the driver wasn’t the same gender as the owner. But, reasonable suspicion was developing the driver was under the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: While the driver wasn’t the owner with the suspended license, RS separately developed to continue the stop

Reason: The FBI Took Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back—and Lost.

Reason: The FBI Took Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back—and Lost. by Billy Binion (“The twist underscores just how little accountability exists in civil forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to seize assets without charging the owner with a … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: The FBI Took Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back—and Lost.

D.Conn.: Despite officers’ not thinking there was apparent authority to consent, the consenter did have that authority

“The Court recognizes that Officer Nunez and a female officer expressed ambivalence as to whether N.H. could consent to a search when she was not the registered owner of the Camry.” Still, she had apparent authority to consent. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Despite officers’ not thinking there was apparent authority to consent, the consenter did have that authority

The Guardian: Immigration agents told a teenage US citizen: ‘You’ve got no rights.’ He secretly recorded his brutal arrest

The Guardian: Immigration agents told a teenage US citizen: ‘You’ve got no rights.’ He secretly recorded his brutal arrest by Clare Considine (“Video from Kenny Laynez-Ambrosio, 18, puts fresh scrutiny on the harsh tactics used to reach the Trump administration’s … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on The Guardian: Immigration agents told a teenage US citizen: ‘You’ve got no rights.’ He secretly recorded his brutal arrest

S.D.Cal.: Def doesn’t get discovery of cell phone govt hasn’t decrypted

When the government seizes a cell phone under a warrant and the data is encrypted and it can’t see it, it is not in “possession” for Rule 16 discovery purposes. United States v. Mejia, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142962 (S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Discovery, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Def doesn’t get discovery of cell phone govt hasn’t decrypted

E.D.Tex.: Return of property under Rule 41(g) requires more than a seizure that “might be” unreasonable

The fact property was held after seizure under a search warrant that might be invalid isn’t enough to order equitable return of property under Rule 41(g). Bingli Lin v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142181 (E.D. Tex. June 30, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Return of property under Rule 41(g) requires more than a seizure that “might be” unreasonable

The Intercept: Border Patrol Wants Advanced AI to Spy on American Cities: Even through walls

The Intercept: Border Patrol Wants Advanced AI to Spy on American Cities by Sam Biddle (“A U.S. Border Patrol ‘Industry Day’ deck also asks for drones, seismic sensors, and tech that can see through walls.”) Really. Never read Kyllo (2001)?

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: Border Patrol Wants Advanced AI to Spy on American Cities: Even through walls

CA6: Govt. waived PC argument, but GFE carries the day

The government waived reliance on probable cause in the district court, but its good faith exception was presented and supports the search. United States v. Scales, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 18324 (6th Cir. July 21, 2025).* The magistrate’s R&R finding … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Govt. waived PC argument, but GFE carries the day

W.D.N.Y.: Skeletal motion to suppress denied on its face

Skeletal motion to suppress without facts or law denied. United States v. Matar, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141206 (W.D.N.Y. June 25, 2025):

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Skeletal motion to suppress denied on its face

CA8: A state police officer, a part of a federal task force, could lie to cause an arrest to protect a federal witness

“We have decided this question before: ‘whether a St. Paul police officer acted under color of state law when she allegedly lied to protect a federal witness while serving on a federal task force.’ Yassin v. Weyker, 39 F.4th 1086, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA8: A state police officer, a part of a federal task force, could lie to cause an arrest to protect a federal witness

OH6: Refusing consent to search cell phone can’t be sentencing aggravator

Defendant had a constitutional right to refuse consent to search his cell phone, and the trial court erred by considering that as an aggravating factor in sentencing. State v. Dawes, 2025-Ohio-2576, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 2500 (6th Dist. July 22, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: Refusing consent to search cell phone can’t be sentencing aggravator

WaPo: DNA obtained by ruse by TSA

WaPo: Interrogating a cold-case killer: ‘Honey, your DNA was in the crime scene’ (“Police videos show Eugene Gligor being arrested and questioned for the 2001 murder of Leslie Preer in Chevy Chase, Md.”) His DNA was captured at Dulles Airport … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on WaPo: DNA obtained by ruse by TSA

VA: Collective knowledge between state and federal officers for arrest

There was probable cause by collective knowledge for defendant’s arrest at Dulles airport where Virginia police asked Homeland Security to make the arrest. Lewis v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 412 (July 22, 2025) (unpublished).* Appellant’s Fourth Amendment claim was … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Waiver | Comments Off on VA: Collective knowledge between state and federal officers for arrest

TX4: Reformed affidavit in Franks challenge still had PC

Assuming defendant’s Franks argument was valid, he got a hearing, a paragraph of the affidavit was deleted, and probable cause still remained. Affirmed. Del Toro v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5255 (Tex. App. – San Antonio July 23, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX4: Reformed affidavit in Franks challenge still had PC

OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

The granting of the motion to suppress is reversed as not based on competent or credible evidence. The bodycam doesn’t fully support the officer’s testimony there were furtive movements before he got up to the driver’s window, but the bodycam … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH9: Grant of motion to suppress off bodycam video reversed, officer’s testimony not inconsistent

Law Review: Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment

Robert M. White, Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment, 108 Marq. L. Rev. 465 (2024). Abstract:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Law Review: Encryption Backdoors and the Fourth Amendment

D.C.Cir.: Officer saying he had “warrants” required remand for whether consent was mere acquiescence

The district court erred in not considering whether defendant acquiesced in consenting to a search. The officer said he had “warrants,” but there was no clarification whether it was an arrest warrant or search warrant. Reversed. United States v. Glover, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Officer saying he had “warrants” required remand for whether consent was mere acquiescence

CA9: Untimely post-trial motion to suppress not even considered on appeal

“Ellis also argues that the police officers’ search of his rental car resulted from an unconstitutionally prolonged traffic stop and was unsupported by probable cause. He pressed this claim in a post-trial motion that was untimely under Federal Rule of … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Untimely post-trial motion to suppress not even considered on appeal