Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Mich.: Michigan liquor control administrative searches here don’t comply with Burger/Patel

The administrative search provisions of the Michigan liquor control statute don’t measure up to the Burger/Patel standards for administrative searches. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185142 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Michigan liquor control administrative searches here don’t comply with Burger/Patel

Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It.

Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It. by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“The Fourth Amendment says authorities can’t search you or your things without probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Searched His Phone 5 Times Without a Warrant. He’s Asking the Supreme Court To Put a Stop to It.

CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

“This appeal is about the reasonable expectation of privacy–or the lack thereof. Kenneth Mininger secretly placed video cameras in shared rooms in his ex-wife’s house. He used these cameras to record his ex-wife’s minor daughter undressing. The police examined the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: SD card in a video voyeur device placed in another’s bedroom has no REP

CA7: False confession claim is a 4A not 14A claim

Plaintiff’s claim of false confessions sounds in the Fourth Amendment not Fourteenth. But here, the alleged false confession was never used in court. Therefore, no liability. Savory v. Andrews, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24655 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026)*:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA7: False confession claim is a 4A not 14A claim

CA5: RS required of weapons or contraband for search of vagina

This strip search of a female detainee stated a claim and overcame qualified immunity. Brown v. Wallace, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24643 (5th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA5: RS required of weapons or contraband for search of vagina

CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

The affidavit for warrant here provided neither nexus nor timing to address 6740. As to all around it, yes, but not there. As to timing, as to the others, yes, but all the police had as to 6740 was 13-year-old … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on CA4: Affidavit for SW provided neither nexus nor timing and even failed GFE

CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

Bad faith administrative subpoenas are grounded in the Fourth Amendment, but the burden is high in showing bad faith, and plaintiffs didn’t meet it. Queerdoc, PLLC v. DOJ, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 24567 (9th Cir. Aug. 14, 2026) (“The prohibition … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA9: Ptfs didn’t meet burden of showing administrative subpoena was 4A violation or in bad faith

CA2: No 4A requirement for SWs being issued with notice to target

Search warrants are usually issued ex parte, and there’s no Fourth Amendment justification for advance notice to the target of the search. It avoids warning the target to destroy or hide evidence or flee. United States v. Leeper, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA2: No 4A requirement for SWs being issued with notice to target

CA6: Denying ptf access to his own bathroom during a search of his house stated 4A claim

“In light of totality of the circumstances of this case, we thus ask whether Plaintiff has plausibly alleged that Defendant Josephs’ repeated refusal of Plaintiff’s requests to use his own restroom rendered Plaintiff’s seizure unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Though … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Seizure, State constitution, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Denying ptf access to his own bathroom during a search of his house stated 4A claim

W.D.Mo.: Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under 4A

Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Maldonadochavarria, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180956 (W.D. Mo. July 13, 2026). “Here, King was placed in handcuffs and moved from the Rite Shop … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Not exactly following the inventory policy doesn’t make it unreasonable under 4A

GA: No IAC for not challenging complete cell phone download before search

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging a complete cell phone download as overbroad before the search because no binding case says it is. Lenon v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 250 (Aug. 13, 2026). The question is not whether plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Overbreadth, Probable cause | Comments Off on GA: No IAC for not challenging complete cell phone download before search

DNYUZ: CBP Workers Allegedly Used Government Databases to Spy on Exes, Crushes, and Colleagues

DNYUZ: CBP Workers Allegedly Used Government Databases to Spy on Exes, Crushes, and Colleagues:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on DNYUZ: CBP Workers Allegedly Used Government Databases to Spy on Exes, Crushes, and Colleagues

ABAJ: Is resetting your phone after being stopped by Border Patrol agents a federal offense?

ABAJ: Is resetting your phone after being stopped by Border Patrol agents a federal offense? By Anna Stolley Persky:

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on ABAJ: Is resetting your phone after being stopped by Border Patrol agents a federal offense?

NYT: Flock Announces Privacy Updates to Its Car-Tracking Cameras

NYT: Flock Announces Privacy Updates to Its Car-Tracking Cameras by Aruni Soni (“Critics say the measures are “public relations” and leave room for continued misuse.”):

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on NYT: Flock Announces Privacy Updates to Its Car-Tracking Cameras

S.D.N.Y.: Project Veritas SW unsealed with limited redactions

One of the Project Veritas search warrant affidavits is partially redacted for privacy of some people and ordered filed. Redactions must be limited. In re Search Warrant Dated Nov. 5, 2021, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179075 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2026):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Project Veritas SW unsealed with limited redactions

D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

This search warrant for a firearm wasn’t stale because firearms are kept. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Cherry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178900 (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 2026).* Defendant’s failure to file a post-trial … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

VA: Reverse keyword search warrant to Google decided on GFE but not merits

Reverse keyword search warrant to Google connected defendant to this crime. It’s not like geofence warrants in Chatrie, but the merits aren’t decided because the good faith exception applies in any event. Clements v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 428 … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on VA: Reverse keyword search warrant to Google decided on GFE but not merits

N.D.Ohio: Two dog sniffs didn’t provide PC for vehicle search

The first dog sniff didn’t provide probable cause, but it did provide reasonable suspicion to continue the stop longer. Then a second sniff didn’t either. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Copeland, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178749 (N.D. Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Two dog sniffs didn’t provide PC for vehicle search

GA reaffirms a constitutional right of privacy in medical records

Georgia reaffirms there is a constitutional right of privacy in medical records. Here it was a civil discovery dispute. Goodell v. Moulton, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 232 (Aug. 11, 2026):

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA reaffirms a constitutional right of privacy in medical records

N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop

The stop was not extended by the drug dog that arrived almost immediately and the sniff was done while the records check was going on. Alternatively, there was reasonable suspicion for it. United States v. Billips, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Dog sniff, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Dog sniff during initial records check did not extend the stop