{"id":9488,"date":"2013-09-24T07:16:34","date_gmt":"2013-09-24T07:01:38","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-09-24T07:01:38","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=9488","title":{"rendered":"Two For. Intel. Surv. Ct. cases on Lexis today"},"content":{"rendered":"

One is the one previously posted<\/a>: In re Application of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for an Order Requiring Production of Tangible Things from [Redacted]<\/a>, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134786 (Foreign Int. Surv. Ct. August 29, 2013) (order expires October 11, 2013).<\/p>\n

The other finds the CIA minimization procedures comply with the Fourth Amendment. In re [Redacted], 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157706 (Foreign Int. Surv. Ct. October 3, 2011):<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

3. The Amended CIA Minimization Procedures<\/p>\n

The CIA minimization procedures include a new querying provision [TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT] The new language would allow the CIA to conduct queries of Section 702-acquired information using United States-person identifiers. All CIA queries of the Section 702 collection would be subject to review by the Department of Justice and the Office of the DNI. [TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT], the addition of the new CIA querying provision does not preclude the Court from concluding that the amended CIA minimization procedures satisfy the statutory definition of minimization procedures and comply with the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\n

The amended CIA minimization procedures include [TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT] raises no concerns in the context of the CIA minimization procedures.<\/p>\n

[TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT]<\/p>\n

The government also has added [TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT] It likewise raises no Fourth Amendment problem. [TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT]<\/p>\n

Finally, a new provision [TEXT REDACTED BY THE COURT] The Court likewise sees no problem with the addition to the CIA minimization procedures.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There is one prior opinion I remember: In re Directives [Redacted] Pursuant to Section 105B of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 27417 (Foreign Int. Surv. Ct. Rev. August 22, 2008) posted here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}