The officer, while writing a citation, called for a drug dog. Then he ordered defendant out of the vehicle for the sniff. It took ten minutes, and it did not unduly prolong the stop. United States v. Starr, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131480 (D. Utah September 12, 2013).*<\/p>\n
A citizen informant gave specific information that led to defendant\u2019s stop for being an impaired driver, and it was with reasonable suspicion. Russell v. State<\/a>, 993 N.E.2d 1176 (Ind. App. 2013).*<\/p>\n When defendant saw the officers, he approached them, and they started talking. They asked for ID and he had none. He gave a name which didn\u2019t come back on a computer check. He was not seized. State v. Matthews<\/a>, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1846 (La. App. 4 Cir. September 12, 2013).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s state law required \u201ccertified question\u201d concerned only his stop and not the statement that came from the stop, so he didn\u2019t preserve the issue for appeal. State v. Hasaflook<\/a>, 2013 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 772 (September 12, 2013).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s handcuffing did not transform the detention into an arrest. In addition, his father consented to a search, and then came his admission, so the admission was not based on his arrest but a co-tenant\u2019s consent. State v. Barabin<\/a>, 124 So. 3d 1121 (La. App. 4 Cir. 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading