{"id":9353,"date":"2013-12-20T08:36:40","date_gmt":"2013-08-28T08:26:13","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2013-08-28T08:26:13","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=9353","title":{"rendered":"CA9: On denial of rehearing, suspicionless probation search was valid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On rehearing, a panel of the Ninth Circuit reaffirms its decision on a probation search, but a dissent was added. <a href=\"http:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2013\/08\/27\/11-10182.pdf\">United States v. King<\/a>, 736 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2013), amended August 27, 2013. Summary by the court:<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The panel amended a March 8, 2013, opinion [711 F.3d 986] affirming a conviction, and the court denied a petition for rehearing en banc, in a case involving whether the Fourth Amendment permits a suspicionless search of a probationer&#8217;s residence.<\/p>\n<p>In the amended opinion, the panel held that a suspicionless search, conducted pursuant to a suspicionless-search condition of a violent felon&#8217;s probation agreement, does not violate the Fourth Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>Dissenting, Judge Berzon wrote that the majority does not give appropriate weight to the particular language in the defendant&#8217;s search condition and to the Supreme Court&#8217;s holdings that probationers have greater expectations of privacy than parolees.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=9353\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9353"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9353\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}