Defendant was walking in a high crime area of the Bronx and he saw a police car and avoided it. The officers watched him moving his hands like he was adjusting a gun, and when they got closer they could see the butt. The stop was justified. United States v. Williams, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118890 (S.D. N.Y. August 14, 2013).*<\/p>\n
2255 claim that affiant violated Franks fails because the person named wasn\u2019t the affiant. United States v. Baez, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118619 (D. R.I. August 21, 2013).*<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen Mr. Henderson entered the guilty plea, he reserved the right to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress but did not assert that the motion was dispositive, and the trial court made no such finding.\u201d Therefore, he can\u2019t appeal it under Florida law. Henderson v. State<\/a>, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13061 (Fla. 2d DCA August 21, 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading