Defendant showed no standing in his neighbor\u2019s backyard. United States v. Casby, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108266 (E.D. La. August 1, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defense counsel was not ineffective for not moving to dismiss his state indictment for lack of probable cause where there was probable cause. United States v. Waters, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107771 (E.D. Pa. July 31, 2013).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s traffic stop for a defective headlight in daylight, a \u201cgloomy day,\u201d was valid under Michigan law. United States v. Dent, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108379 (E.D. Mich. August 2, 2013).*<\/p>\n
A night employee of Wal-Mart found a cell phone in a shopping cart, and she turned it on to try to ascertain the owner. Looking through pictures she found apparent child pornography. She took the phone to the police and showed them. They took the phone and got a search warrant based on what they were shown. It was all reasonable as coming from the private search. United States v. Johnson, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108850 (M.D. Fla. August 2, 2013),* R&R 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108849 (M.D. Fla. February 8, 2013).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading