Defendant was arrested alone in a car, so it was going to be towed, and that means an inventory would be conducted. Hidden in an open container was false identity documents, and he\u2019s charged with aggravated identity theft. He doesn\u2019t even get an evidentiary hearing because the papers are sufficient. The parties filed the reports and the inventory policy. United States v. Exume, 953 F. Supp. 2d 319 (D. Mass. 2013).*<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
As an initial matter, the Court declines to hold an evidentiary hearing because defendant has failed to make a “sufficient threshold showing” that material facts are in dispute which cannot reliably be resolved on the paper record and which would entitle defendant to the requested relief if resolved in his favor. … In order to obtain an evidentiary hearing, a defendant must “allege facts sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and nonconjectural” from which the Court may conclude that a substantial claim is presented. …<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading