Defendant was stopped for weaving, and it was likely he was under the influence by his appearance and mannerisms and the smell of alcohol. His nervous behavior with his arms and finding out he was on parole justified the patdown. United States v. Chambers, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92227 (E.D. Mo. June 3, 2013).*<\/p>\n
On a motion to reconsider a Terry stop after a drug deal elsewhere under Bailey<\/a>, the court decides that there were independent facts for the stop here that separates the case from Bailey<\/a>. United States v. McGowan, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92896 (N.D. Ala. May 29, 2013).*<\/p>\n Defendant\u2019s furtive movement was hiding a ski mask under his leg, and that justified the officer asking for it. Commonwealth v. Letkowski<\/a>, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 847, 991 N.E.2d 1106 (2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading