The officer made reasonable inquiry into the occupancy of the building that was the target of the search and concluded it was one unit with two doors. A reasonable inquiry doesn\u2019t always require contacting the utility providers too, when there is one electric meter. Here, there was a brick wall visible only from the inside that divided the premises into two units. \u201cFacts \u2018that emerge after the warrant is issued have no bearing on whether or not a warrant was validly issued.\u2019 Garrison, 480 U.S. at 85.\u201d United States v. Figueroa, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88034 (D. Del. June 24, 2013).<\/p>\n
Crouching between cars on the parking lot of grocery store at night was suspicious enough for a stop and patdown, and a gun was found. United States v. Benavidez<\/a>, 528 Fed. Appx. 829 (10th Cir. 2013).*<\/p>\n Officer\u2019s calling a \u201cmulti-colored glass smoking device\u201d as a \u201cbong\u201d in the affidavit for search warrant was not misleading for Franks purposes. State v. Holly<\/a>, 2013 ND 94, 833 N.W.2d 15 (2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading