Defendant has standing as \u201can aggrieved person\u201d to challenge the initial consent of one recording a conversation with him. United States v. Hawkins, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50952 (W.D. Mo. April 9, 2013).<\/p>\n
Officers interrupted a burglary in progress and had reasonable suspicion that a nearby car was involved to be able to stop it. Waldron v. State<\/a>, 321 Ga. App. 246, 741 S.E.2d 301 (2013).*<\/p>\n Petitioner\u2019s search issue should have been raised on direct appeal, so it can\u2019t be raised in post-conviction. State v. Allen<\/a>, 2013 Ohio 1409, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 1314 (5th Dist. March 25, 2013).*<\/p>\n Defendant rousted from bed by officers in his house with a search warrant, patted down, taken outside to a police car barefooted, and questioned in a patrol car front seat with an officer next to him and behind him was \u201cin custody\u201d for Miranda purposes. United States v. Lee, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51657 (M.D. Fla. April 10, 2013).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading