Defendant was arrested on a fast food restaurant parking lot, and it was appropriate for the officers to tow and inventory the vehicle under Ninth Circuit precedent. Also, defendant\u2019s sister was called about getting the car, but she wouldn\u2019t come until the following day. United States v. Sequeira, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158636 (D. Ariz. September 28, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s consent was voluntary; defendant told the officers where the firearms were and provided the key to get in. United States v. Yonts, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158911 (E.D. Ky. November 6, 2012).*<\/p>\n
The security sweep of defendant\u2019s garage was proper. The officers properly looked behind things for persons, and there they found hidden marijuana. This was called a \u201csecond\u201d sweep by one of the officers, but the court finds that it was a continuation of the initial sweep. United States v. Sinclair, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158445 (W.D. N.Y. November 2, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading