Defendant was with four men, one of whom was wanted and in a high crime area. It was not unreasonable to order all four to the ground so the lone officer at the scene could control it. He was frisked quickly by the first officer there, and another showed up and subjected him to another frisk finding drugs. United States v. Howard, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157691 (W.D. Wis. October 22, 2012),* adopted 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157691 (W.D. Wis. November 2, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Reaching over the console during a stop for a seatbelt violation is not a furtive gesture warranting a patdown. Nothing else suggested criminal conduct. Grantham v. City of Tuscaloosa, 2012 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 89 (November 2, 2012).*<\/p>\n
A citizen informant in a bar told the officer that the defendant was going to get in a particular truck and drive, and he was \u201cwasted\u201d drunk. The face-to-face meeting with predictors that all proved true was reasonable suspicion for a stop. Venegas v. State<\/a>, 2012 WY 136, 287 P.3d 746 (2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading