{"id":792,"date":"2007-08-10T11:32:44","date_gmt":"2007-02-19T07:30:05","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-19T07:30:05","slug":"en-US","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=792","title":{"rendered":"Overly general description of suspect did not justify defendant&#8217;s stop"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Nonspecific information about the color of skin and dress of a suspect did not justify stopping the defendant. Once stopped, reasonable suspicion did not develop from his comments about where he was going which the officer found directionally challenged. &#8220;Most importantly, however, mere inconsistency between origin and direction of travel fails to provide reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity.&#8221; Consent did not purge the taint.  State v. Anguiano, 37 Kan. App. 2d 202, 151 P.3d 857 (2007).*<\/p>\n<p>Inventory policy that requires an inventory of all locked containers was valid. It extended to any situation where the keys of a locked vehicle were being turned over to a towing company. &#8220;Further, by requiring officers to complete an inventory search of trunks when the trunk will be accessible to the third-party towing company, Gresham&#8217;s policy removes any discretion on the part of the officers and provides the standardized procedures favored by the Supreme Court.&#8221; United States v. Williams, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11022 (D. Ore. February 15, 2007).*<\/p>\n<p>A \u00a7 1983 claim over a traffic ticket not prosecuted that did not mention violation of a constitutional right was dismissed under qualified immunity. Harlow v. Forsythe, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10878 (D. S.C. February 12, 2007)* [actually, such a claim is integral to a \u00a7 1983 claim for jurisdiction to attach; qualified immunity is a different analysis].<\/p>\n<p>Open container violation on a convenience store parking lot supported an investigative stop that led to seeing a gun and finding a warrant on the defendant. United States v. Brown, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10879 (W.D. Tenn. February 12, 2007).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>b2evALnk.b2WPAutP <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/?p=792\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"pingsdone","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-792","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=792"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=792"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=792"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/fourthamendment.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=792"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}