Officers with an arrest warrant had probable cause, not just reasonable suspicion which is all that is required, to believe that defendant was in a camper, so they could enter it. United States v. Locke, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155207 (E.D. Tenn. October 29, 2012),* R&R 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156221 (E.D. Tenn. August 29, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Defendant\u2019s stop was based on a purported hostage of a smuggler calling 911 and identifying herself. That was entitled to more reliability. United States v. Lagos, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155108 (S.D. Tex. October 30, 2012).*<\/p>\n
Property owner\u2019s Fourth Amendment administrative warrant claim changed on appeal, so the change was defaulted. Levitt v. City of Oak Ridge<\/a>, 2012 Tenn. App. LEXIS 753 (October 30, 2012).*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" b2evALnk.b2WPAutP Continue reading